2022
DOI: 10.1080/08820538.2022.2110844
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Malpractice Cases Arising From Telephone Based Telemedicine Triage in Ophthalmology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with this concern is the finding of one analysis that 68% of telehealth-related malpractice lawsuits were the product of a failed diagnosis [80]. A more contemporary investigation in ophthalmology reported similar results, with 61.1% of cases alleging misdiagnosis [81]. This uncertainty can affect the willingness of ocular healthcare professionals to adopt teleophthalmology practices, an attitude widely mirrored among other medical practitioners [82].…”
Section: Broad Ethico-legal Challengesmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Consistent with this concern is the finding of one analysis that 68% of telehealth-related malpractice lawsuits were the product of a failed diagnosis [80]. A more contemporary investigation in ophthalmology reported similar results, with 61.1% of cases alleging misdiagnosis [81]. This uncertainty can affect the willingness of ocular healthcare professionals to adopt teleophthalmology practices, an attitude widely mirrored among other medical practitioners [82].…”
Section: Broad Ethico-legal Challengesmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The extreme relevance of the legal implications of the system proposed in this study and illustrated in Figure 1 cannot be underestimated. Such systems can undoubtedly lead to malpractice lawsuits for several reasons, including but not limited to delays in evaluation or treatment, incorrect diagnoses, improper risk discussion, and delayed referrals [ 63 ]. However, many of these reasons can be grouped as communication failure, as pointed out by Ernesäter, Engström, and Holmström [ 64 ].…”
Section: Legal Implications Of Telemedicine In Traumatic Hand Injuriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 cases of suspected misdiagnosis, 7 cases related to risk explanation or consent, and 1 case of a suspected pending referral. (17) Meanwhile, there is no data on the number of legal cases or patient complaints related to telemedicine in Indonesia. Suppose there is an error in a doctor's diagnosis during the teleconsultation service from the patient's point of view as a consumer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%