1996
DOI: 10.1002/smj.4250171106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm

Abstract: / <' -----\'-----------

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

16
1,987
1
179

Year Published

1998
1998
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3,087 publications
(2,294 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
16
1,987
1
179
Order By: Relevance
“…The distinction between tangible and intangible was first investigated in depth by Amit and Schoemaker (1993), who divided resources generally into resources (goods that are tradable and available to many firms) and capabilities, which are more specific to a particular firm. This latter division has become the tentative basis of the knowledge-based view (KBV) of the firm; its supporters (e.g., Spender, 1996) believe, probably correctly, that knowledge-base(s) and the capability of utilising suchlike within an organisation will affect overall organisational performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distinction between tangible and intangible was first investigated in depth by Amit and Schoemaker (1993), who divided resources generally into resources (goods that are tradable and available to many firms) and capabilities, which are more specific to a particular firm. This latter division has become the tentative basis of the knowledge-based view (KBV) of the firm; its supporters (e.g., Spender, 1996) believe, probably correctly, that knowledge-base(s) and the capability of utilising suchlike within an organisation will affect overall organisational performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous suggestions have been made as to how the efficiency of the boards could be improved, but only a few of these suggestions have taken into account what is today common understanding in the strategic management literature, namely that the key task of firm governance is to generate, accumulate, transfer and protect valuable knowledge and capability (e.g. Penrose 1959;Rumelt 1984;Teece et al 1977;Kogut & Zander 1996;Spender 1996). In particular, agency theory, as the main approach in the corporate governance discussion, has disregarded knowledge work aspects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As has been widely discussed in the knowledge based theory of the firm (e.g. Grant 1996;Kogut & Zander 1996;Nonaka & Takeuchi 1995;Spender 1996), sustainable, hard to imitate competitive advantages need firm-specific investments in knowledge capital. In contrast to physical work, knowledge work cannot be contracted ex ante when the parties enter a relationship.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Como conseqüência, encontra-se na literatura a noção de que as pessoas podem constituir um enorme potencial na organização, pois são capazes de gerar conhecimento, inovação e novos insights, que dão origem aos mais diversificados arranjos de recursos (Spender, 1996). Wright, Dunford e Snell (2001) acrescentam que, ao adotar a Teoria dos Recursos da Firma para a gestão de pessoas, a abordagem estratégica de Recursos Humanos, que ganha destaque a partir dos anos 80, pressupõe, necessariamente que (i) uma determinada estratégia demanda um conjunto especial de comportamentos e atitudes dos empregados; e que (ii) certas políticas produzem um único conjunto de respostas dos empregados.…”
Section: )unclassified