2001
DOI: 10.1006/clad.2001.0174
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Majority Does Not Rule: The Trouble with Majority-Rule Consensus Trees

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The majority of the most parsimonious trees (86%) place most members of subf. Bromelioideae as sister to “Core Puya ,” though majority rule consensus trees should not be interepreted as indicative of support of relationships (Sharkey and Leathers, 2001). Subgenus Puya clearly is not monophyletic as P. boliviensis, P. castellanosii , and P. raimondii are placed in “Core Puya ,” whereas P. chilensis, P. alpestris , and P. berteroniana are placed in “Chilean Puya .” Species monophyly is not recovered within “Chilean Puya ” although branch lengths are very short.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of the most parsimonious trees (86%) place most members of subf. Bromelioideae as sister to “Core Puya ,” though majority rule consensus trees should not be interepreted as indicative of support of relationships (Sharkey and Leathers, 2001). Subgenus Puya clearly is not monophyletic as P. boliviensis, P. castellanosii , and P. raimondii are placed in “Core Puya ,” whereas P. chilensis, P. alpestris , and P. berteroniana are placed in “Chilean Puya .” Species monophyly is not recovered within “Chilean Puya ” although branch lengths are very short.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wheeler, 1995; Whiting et al ., 1997; Prendini, 2000c; Wheeler et al ., 2001), results of the sensitivity analyses are summarized by means of 50% majority rule (Margush & McMorris, 1981), or 50% compromise ( sensu Nixon & Carpenter, 1996), and strict consensus trees. The problems with using majority rule consensus trees as a means of resolving ambiguous strict consensus trees have been well elaborated by Nixon & Carpenter (1996) and Sharkey & Leathers (2001), among others. Their use in the present context is justified on the grounds that they serve a different purpose.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So the topology presented in Xi et al's (2014) figure 2, which is the primary basis for their conclusion that the clade of (Amborella, Nuphar) is sister to the rest of the angiosperms, was only inferred as optimal for the complete matrix of 310 nuclear genes by STAR. Xi et al (2014) reported that the clade of (Amborella, Nuphar) was highly supported (99% partitioned bootstrap support) by MP-EST, but even 99% resampling support does not guarantee that a clade is actually supported by the complete, original data set (Goloboff and Farris, 2001;Sharkey and Leathers, 2001;Goloboff and Pol, 2005;Simmons and Freudenstein, 2011). Only those clades present in the strict consensus of all equally optimal trees are unambiguously supported by the data (Nixon and Carpenter, 1996b;Goloboff et al, 2003).…”
Section: Gene-tree-based Phylogenetic Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%