1985
DOI: 10.1016/0048-9697(85)90163-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Major metals in human cancer: Calcium, magnesium, sodium and potassium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Single-cell resolution measurements provide an improvement over conventional methods of total Mg determination in tumor versus normal tissues via techniques such as atomic absorption spectroscopy, since homogenization of the tumors would result in mixing of both necrotic and viable portions of the tumor, as well as infiltrating non-neoplastic cells and extracellular fluids, thereby producing inaccuracies in the measurements. Indeed, inconsistent and often contradictory observations of decreased or increased levels of Mg in various types of cancers have been reported based on tissue homogenization methods [34, 35]. Nevertheless, these early studies were valuable in demonstrating that all cancers cannot be grouped under one category and each type should be regarded as a separate entity for the regulation of metal concentrations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Single-cell resolution measurements provide an improvement over conventional methods of total Mg determination in tumor versus normal tissues via techniques such as atomic absorption spectroscopy, since homogenization of the tumors would result in mixing of both necrotic and viable portions of the tumor, as well as infiltrating non-neoplastic cells and extracellular fluids, thereby producing inaccuracies in the measurements. Indeed, inconsistent and often contradictory observations of decreased or increased levels of Mg in various types of cancers have been reported based on tissue homogenization methods [34, 35]. Nevertheless, these early studies were valuable in demonstrating that all cancers cannot be grouped under one category and each type should be regarded as a separate entity for the regulation of metal concentrations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A decrease in serum ionized magnesium concentration might at times be secondary to its altered distribution (Table II). The two conditions more likely to be encountered by the hematology/oncology consultant are massive transfusions causing binding of the mineral to citrate and movement of the mineral into the cells of rapidly growing solid tumors 32, 50, 51.…”
Section: Hypomagnesemiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Table 2, the concentrations of some elements in bonemarrow fluid obtained by NAA 7 and AAS [8][9][10] are also shown as literature values. Since NAA generally allows multielement analysis, the analytical values for 7 elements in bone-marrow fluid are provided in the literature for NAA.…”
Section: Determination Of Major-to-ultratrace Elements In Bone-marrowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analytical results for the bone-marrow fluid sample are summarized in Table 2, where the literature values of the elements in bone-marrow fluid obtained by NAA (neutron activation analysis) 7 and AAS (atomic absorption spectrometry) [8][9][10] are also shown for a comparison. It can be seen from Table 2 that 20 elements in bone-marrow fluid could be determined in the present experiment, which were in the concentration range from 1610 µg g -1 for Na to 0.00043 µg g -1 for W. In Table 2, the observed values obtained in the present experiment are expressed as the mean of 3 replicated measurements, together with their standard deviation (SD) and relative standard deviation (RSD).…”
Section: Determination Of Major-to-ultratrace Elements In Bone-marrowmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation