2019 15th International Conference on Electronics, Computer and Computation (ICECCO) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/icecco48375.2019.9043225
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maintaining Voting Integrity using Blockchain

Abstract: The potentials of using blockchains and distributed ledgers to support voting processes have attracted significant attention in the electronic voting community. Most of these recent ideas are centered on blockchain-based e-voting protocols. Others focus on how blockchain can be exploited to simultaneously deliver auditability and anonymity of voters in the voting process. A common feature of these research efforts is the use of blockchain within e-voting contexts. We elaborate in this work the integrity requir… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors considered a political paradox relating to the use of technology such as a blockchain and its contribution to democracy and social peace in ensuring the transparency of election processes. For example, it could worsen the current political system in a non-democratic society by increasing the level of control over the population ( Adeshina and Ojo, 2019 ; Shahzad and Crowcroft, 2019 ; De Filippi, 2018 ; Hofman and Novin, 2018 ). Indeed, one of the main concerns highlighted during the interviews was the potential integrity of the holder of the technology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The authors considered a political paradox relating to the use of technology such as a blockchain and its contribution to democracy and social peace in ensuring the transparency of election processes. For example, it could worsen the current political system in a non-democratic society by increasing the level of control over the population ( Adeshina and Ojo, 2019 ; Shahzad and Crowcroft, 2019 ; De Filippi, 2018 ; Hofman and Novin, 2018 ). Indeed, one of the main concerns highlighted during the interviews was the potential integrity of the holder of the technology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blockchain developers and researchers have identified voting process issues where solutions are needed: a) public verifiability—the public's ability to verify the entire process and election results; b) individual verifiability—the ability of voters to verify their voting, for example, through their ballot; c) auditability—the ability of a third party to audit the results of an election; d) anonymity, e) transparency—the ability of blockchain to guarantee the openness of the voting procedure ( Hardwick et al., 2018 ; Liu and Wang, 2017 ). Adeshina and Ojo (2019) discuss two emerging streams of research on blockchain applications in e-voting. The first stream analyzes the use of blockchain for e-voting as a process, such as blockchain-based e-voting, which was launched in Moscow in 2014.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A “democratic” system is defined if only eligible voters can vote, and only a single vote can be cast for each registered voter [ 55 ]. Another function is that no one else should be able to duplicate the vote.…”
Section: Security Requirements For Voting Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intercommunication between nodes is via encrypted multicast or broadcast. The votes are stored in bundles of records called blocks, which are chained together using a hash function to form a ledger [33], [46]. Fig.…”
Section: Adeva Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%