2017
DOI: 10.3758/s13423-017-1383-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnitude and incentives: revisiting the overweighting of extreme events in risky decisions from experience

Abstract: Recent experimental evidence in experiencebased decision-making suggests that people are more risk seeking in the gains domain relative to the losses domain. This critical result is at odds with the standard reflection effect observed in description-based choice and explained by Prospect Theory. The so-called reversed-reflection effect has been predicated on the extreme-outcome rule, which suggests that memory biases affect risky choice from experience. To test the general plausibility of the rule, we conducte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(59 reference statements)
7
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The observed relative payout effect is consistent with recent evidence that people overweight outcomes near the edges of an experienced distribution, increasing avoidance of options that could lead to the worst outcome and enhancing attraction to options that could lead to the best outcome (; see for a review). People also showed enhanced recall for the best and worst payouts.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The observed relative payout effect is consistent with recent evidence that people overweight outcomes near the edges of an experienced distribution, increasing avoidance of options that could lead to the worst outcome and enhancing attraction to options that could lead to the best outcome (; see for a review). People also showed enhanced recall for the best and worst payouts.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In contrast, faster adaptation in the decreasing condition may be due to strong recency effects (Avrahami et al, 2016), where most recent experiences help participants realize a decrease in the frequency of the best outcome, which may increase the exploration of the safe option. The slight emergent preference for the safe option in the static condition is consistent with diminishing sensitivity and risk aversion in the gains domain, which is consistent with a range of studies in experience-based decision-making (e.g., Erev, Ert, & Yechiam, 2008;Ert & Yechiam, 2010;Konstantinidis, Taylor, & Newell, 2018).…”
Section: Questionnaire On the Awareness Of Changesupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Experience-based risky choices are also influenced by the set of available values in a decision context. When making decisions based on experience, people tend to be more risk seeking for relative gains than losses-the opposite of decisions made from explicit descriptions (e.g., Ludvig & Spetch, 2011;Kahneman & Tversky, 1979;Konstantinidis, et al, 2018;Wulff et al, 2018). This pattern of experienced-based risky choice appears to be driven by overweighting of the most extreme (best and worst) outcomes in the decision context (Ludvig et al, 2014(Ludvig et al, , 2018.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%