Magnification Endoscopy and Chromoendoscopy in Evaluation of Specialized Intestinal Metaplasia in Barrett’s Esophagus

Abstract

BackgroundSpecialized intestinal metaplasia (SIM) in Barrett’s esophagus is a risk factor of esophageal adenocarcinoma. It often occurs focally and cannot be distinguished from surrounding columnar epithelium with conventional endoscopy.AimsThe purpose of this study was evaluation of methylene blue (MB) staining and magnification endoscopy with comparison of pit-pattern classifications according to Endo and Guelrud, in detection of SIM in Barrett’s esophagus.MethodsTwenty-five patients, aged 33–77 years (average 57 years), with displacement of Z line were prospectively enrolled and underwent gastroscopy with the use of magnification up to 115 times (Olympus GIF Q160Z). Biopsy for histopathologic examination was taken from sites stained with MB and/or places with particular pit patterns. A control group consisted of ten patients with normal gastro-esophageal junction.ResultsSIM was proved in nine patients, and significantly more frequently in patients with hiatal hernia and Barrett’s segment longer than 3 cm. Round or thin linear pit patterns according to Guelrud’s and small round and straight pit patterns according to Endo’s classification were coupled with columnar epithelium. SIM was associated with deep linear and foveolar pit patterns in Guelrud’s classification. Other pit patterns were less characteristic. Both classifications had high sensitivity (Endo’s 85.7%, Guelrud’s 92.8%) but poor specificity (respectively, 21.15 and 28.4%) in detection of SIM. Sensitivity and specificity of MB staining were, respectively, 71.4 and 40.6%.ConclusionsDespite existing association between mucosal surface structure and histology, we find no convincing data indicating that pit-pattern evaluation may replace multiple biopsies taken according to recommendations from Seattle for detection of SIM in Barrett’s esophagus.

Biomedical optical spectroscopy for the early diagnosis of gastrointestinal neoplasms

“…Magnification endoscopy equipped with a system of movable lenses enables the size and visible details of mucosa to be magnified up to 150 times. 80 NBI via a narrow-bandwidth filter allows penetration at peak wavelengths of 415 (blue) and 540 (green) nm, which highlights the superficial mucosal vasculature. 81,82 However, these advances heavily rely on visual information of gross morphologic changes and not on biochemical or molecular analysis, resulting in poor ability for an early diagnosis.…”

Tethered capsule endomicroscopy enables less invasive imaging of gastrointestinal tract microstructure

“…Some GI diseases involve microscopic features that manifest below the tissue surface. Because video imaging only provides information about the superficial mucosal structures, these features cannot be seen with conventional endoscopy or even higher resolution forms of endoscopy such as high-definition magnification endoscopy 3 . For these cases, the physician must randomly biopsy multiple portions of the organ with the hope of sampling the correct spot, which, unfortunately, is often missed.…”

Diagnosis and Management of Barrett’s Esophagus

“…Magnification enables the physician to see and analyze a characteristic structure called a pit pattern. The use of magnification endoscopy with the pit pattern analysis has higher sensitivity than the use of methylene blue chromoendoscopy [ 86 ]. Moreover, magnification endoscopy may correspond to an increase in cell cycles in BE [ 87 ].…”