Diagnosis and Management of Barrett’s Esophagus

Mejza, Maja; Małecka-Wojciesko, Ewa

doi:10.3390/jcm12062141

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 163 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…1 Barrett's esophagus (BE) is one of the main risk factors for EAC, characterized by columnar metaplasia in the distal esophagus, and is a well-established precancerous state of EAC. 2 As one of the main risk factors of BE, chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) causes the abnormal reflux of acid and bile salts into the esophagus, which can regulate oncogenic signaling pathways to promote the progression of BE and EAC. [3][4][5] Nevertheless, the detailed underlying mechanism is still elusive.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Exosome-Delivered EGFR Induced by Acidic Bile Salts Regulates Macrophage M2 Polarization to Promote Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Cell Proliferation

Chen,

Ding,

et al. 2024

OTT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose Chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) causes the abnormal reflux of acid and bile salts, which would induce Barrett’s esophagus (BE) and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). EGFR, as one of main components of the exosome, plays an important role in cancer progression. Here, we investigated the role of acidic bile salts (ABS)-induced exosomal EGFR in EAC cell proliferation. Methods Electronic microscopic examination and Western blot were used to identify exosomes. Western blot, siRNA transfection, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, qRT-PCR, cell viability detection, mouse xenograft tumor models, and immunohistochemical staining were performed to study the function of ABS-induced exosomal EGFR in cell proliferation. Results We found that ABS improved the exosomal EGFR level of normal human esophageal epithelial cells, BE cells, and BE-associated adenocarcinoma cells. The results were confirmed in the serum-derived exosomes from healthy persons and patients suffering from GERD, BE with or without GERD, and EAC with or without GERD. Moreover, cell line-derived exosomal EGFR was found to promote macrophage M2 polarization through the PI3K-AKT pathway. The co-incubation medium of macrophages and exosomes improved cell proliferation and tumor growth, which depended on the exosomal EGFR level. CCL18 was identified as the most effective component of the co-incubation medium to promote EAC cell proliferation by binding to its receptor PITPNM3 in vitro and in vivo. Conclusion Our findings demonstrate that ABS-induced exosomal EGFR regulates macrophage M2 polarization to promote EAC proliferation. This study provides an important insight into the role of ABS in EAC development.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Exosome-Delivered EGFR Induced by Acidic Bile Salts Regulates Macrophage M2 Polarization to Promote Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Cell Proliferation

Chen,

Ding,

et al. 2024

OTT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

The Aberrant Expression of Biomarkers and Risk Prediction for Neoplastic Changes in Barrett’s Esophagus–Dysplasia

Choi,

Bedford,

Pollack

2024

Cancers

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Barrett’s esophagus (BE) is a pre-neoplastic condition associated with an increased risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). The accurate diagnosis of BE and grading of dysplasia can help to optimize the management of patients with BE. However, BE may be missed and the accurate grading of dysplasia based on a routine histology has a considerable intra- and interobserver variability. Thus, well-defined biomarker testing remains indispensable. The aim of our study was to identify routinely applicable and relatively specific biomarkers for an accurate diagnosis of BE, as well as determining biomarkers to predict the risk of progression in BE–dysplasia. Methods: Retrospectively, we performed immunohistochemistry to test mucin 2(MUC2), trefoil factor 3 (TFF3), p53, p16, cyclin D1, Ki-67, beta-catenin, and minichromosome maintenance (MCM2) in biopsies. Prospectively, to identify chromosomal alterations, we conducted fluorescent in situ hybridization testing on fresh brush samples collected at the time of endoscopy surveillance. Results: We discovered that MUC2 and TFF3 are specific markers for the diagnosis of BE. Aberrant expression, including the loss and strong overexpression of p53, Ki-67, p16, beta-catenin, cyclin D1, and MCM2, was significantly associated with low-grade dysplasia (LGD), high-grade dysplasia (HGD), and EAC histology, with a relatively high risk of neoplastic changes. Furthermore, the aberrant expressions of p53 and p16 in BE-indefinite dysplasia (IND) progressor cohorts predicted the risk of progression. Conclusions: Assessing the biomarkers would be a suitable adjunct to accurate BE histology diagnoses and improve the accuracy of BE–dysplasia grading, thus reducing interobserver variability, particularly of LGD and risk prediction.

show abstract

Diagnosis and Management of Barrett’s Esophagus

Cited by 2 publications

References 163 publications

Exosome-Delivered EGFR Induced by Acidic Bile Salts Regulates Macrophage M2 Polarization to Promote Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Cell Proliferation

Exosome-Delivered EGFR Induced by Acidic Bile Salts Regulates Macrophage M2 Polarization to Promote Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Cell Proliferation

The Aberrant Expression of Biomarkers and Risk Prediction for Neoplastic Changes in Barrett’s Esophagus–Dysplasia

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About