2003
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.67.024429
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetoelastic coupling in thin films with weak out-of-plane anisotropy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The system studied here is a 200-nm Ni film grown epitaxially in a Cu=Ni=Cu=Si001 structure. This system has been studied previously [3][4][5][6] as a model for the technologically relevant phenomenon of perpendicular magnetization. We begin by noting that, for small Ni thickness t, 3 nm < t < 14 nm, a strong perpendicular magnetization is observed by magneto-optic Kerr effect [3], vibrating sample magnetometry (VSM) [4], torque magnetometry and magnetic force microscopy (MFM) [5,7].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The system studied here is a 200-nm Ni film grown epitaxially in a Cu=Ni=Cu=Si001 structure. This system has been studied previously [3][4][5][6] as a model for the technologically relevant phenomenon of perpendicular magnetization. We begin by noting that, for small Ni thickness t, 3 nm < t < 14 nm, a strong perpendicular magnetization is observed by magneto-optic Kerr effect [3], vibrating sample magnetometry (VSM) [4], torque magnetometry and magnetic force microscopy (MFM) [5,7].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Poisson's ratio of the film is chosen as v f = 0.28 [26] in our calculation. In Figure 2, β x and β y stand for the case of v s = 0.037 [22] , and β ′ x and β ′ y stand for v s = 0.39 [26] , while β is corresponding to the special case of v s = v f . It can be readily seen from Figure 2 that the influence of Poisson's ratio on the positions of two neutral planes is quite different.…”
Section: Neutral Plane Of the Cantilever Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then the cantilever may bend, which is motivated either by the internal residual stress of the film [6,7] or the film magnetostriction [16][17][18] . The measurement of this bending deflection can determine conveniently the stress state and the saturation magnetostriction coefficient of the magnetic film [19][20][21][22] . In fact, early in 1976, Klokholm explored the bending problem of such a cantilever system and obtained the analytical expression of the magnetically induced free-end deflection under the assumption of isotropic magnetostriction strain [16] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the phenomenological theory proposed recently to explain the ME effect at microwave frequency for laminate piezoelectric/magnetostrictive composites does not take into account of this dependence in a reasonable manner. 10 A recent research 11 on the magnetoelastic behaviors of Cu-Ni/Cu-Si epitaxial films sheds us a light on understanding the dependence mentioned earlier. It was revealed that the magnetostress coupling coefficient is a nonlinear function of the applied magnetic field and temperature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%