2003
DOI: 10.1063/1.1613811
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of magnetic bias field on magnetoelectric coupling in magnetoelectric composites

Abstract: The effect of dc magnetic bias field on the magnetoelectric coupling of a two-component magnetoelectric composite structure is investigated numerically using the finite-element method, in which the nonlinear magnetostress coupling for the magnetostrictive component is taken into account. It is shown that the magnetostress coupling coefficient increases first and then falls down with increasing of the bias field, and this behavior is argued to be responsible for the dependence of magnetoelectric yield on the bi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…90 The field dependency of transverse magnetoelectric coefficient (a E,31 ) can be attributed to the non-linear response of magneto-stress coupling in sample. 93 The hysteresis behavior of a E,31 is almost symmetric with respect to change in sign of applied magnetic field (either þH or ÀH) which can be originate from a small biquadratic term P 2 M 2 and can be non-linear magnetoelectricity. 94 …”
Section: J Magnetoelectric Couplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…90 The field dependency of transverse magnetoelectric coefficient (a E,31 ) can be attributed to the non-linear response of magneto-stress coupling in sample. 93 The hysteresis behavior of a E,31 is almost symmetric with respect to change in sign of applied magnetic field (either þH or ÀH) which can be originate from a small biquadratic term P 2 M 2 and can be non-linear magnetoelectricity. 94 …”
Section: J Magnetoelectric Couplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, MSCP can be substituted by PECP; we note that the constitutive equations of both the materials are identical. The properties of the above material have been taken from [Liu et al 2003]; see Table 1. The dimensions of the layered cylinder, length = 4 m, inner radius = 0.7 m and thickness = 0.6 m, are taken from [Wang and Zhong 2003].…”
Section: Constitutive Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The traditional ME theories on the basis of the linear constitutive relationships of magnetostrictive material is inappropriate to describe the nonlinear ME response in a broad range of the bias magnetic field. Therefore, some theoretical researches about the influence of bias magnetic field on ME response are reported [5][6][7][8][9]. Liu et al tried to explain the problem by numerical and finite element methods, but it's still not enough to reveal the inherence of the dependence [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, some theoretical researches about the influence of bias magnetic field on ME response are reported [5][6][7][8][9]. Liu et al tried to explain the problem by numerical and finite element methods, but it's still not enough to reveal the inherence of the dependence [6]. Nan et al predicted the dependence of ME response on H dc by using the Green's function technique and taking into consideration the nonlinear dependence of the magnetostriction of Terfenol-D on H dc , but the model is not in an explicit form [5,8] ME composites based on a nonlinear magnetostrictive constitutive relation, but it is obviously inconvenient for practical applications due to adopting five fitting parameters to fit the experimental results [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation