Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2022.124804
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetically active nanocomposites based on biodegradable polylactide, polycaprolactone, polybutylene succinate and polybutylene adipate terephthalate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…55 It is important to note that the mechanical performance of the nanocomposite materials remains well above the modulus and ductility shown by conventional thermoplastics such as polybutylene succinate or poly(Llactide), whose modulus hardly goes beyond 2500 MPa and elongation at break is found below 10%. 56 Besides, the observed embrittlement is a common feature in polymer nanocomposites, where a premature fracture is observed due to stress concentration effects at filler-rich regions. 57 The TGA curves of CS/ChNC nanocomposite films at different ChNC concentrations are shown in Figure 7b.…”
Section: Acs Sustainablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…55 It is important to note that the mechanical performance of the nanocomposite materials remains well above the modulus and ductility shown by conventional thermoplastics such as polybutylene succinate or poly(Llactide), whose modulus hardly goes beyond 2500 MPa and elongation at break is found below 10%. 56 Besides, the observed embrittlement is a common feature in polymer nanocomposites, where a premature fracture is observed due to stress concentration effects at filler-rich regions. 57 The TGA curves of CS/ChNC nanocomposite films at different ChNC concentrations are shown in Figure 7b.…”
Section: Acs Sustainablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…At least two different materials are involved in the development of polymer-based magnetic composites: the magnetic particles (inorganic component) and the polymeric matrix (organic component). Magnetic nanomaterials typically include iron oxides [ 9 , 10 ], cobalt iron oxides [ 11 ], magnetic alloys of nickel, cobalt and/or iron [ 12 ] and rare-earth containing particles [ 13 ], although strong efforts are being devoted to rare-earth free materials. The different types of magnetic materials, their geometry and dimensions, among other conditions, confer the composite distinct magnetic properties, such as superparamagnetism, ferromagnetism (with varying degrees of magnetic hardness) and antiferromagnetism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The foamed composite displayed a percolation threshold of 0.93 wt.% MWCNT and achieved conductivities of 10 −3 S/m at 4 wt.%. Rincón-Iglesias et al investigated biodegradable polyester/iron oxide composites with filler loadings from 1 to 10 wt.% [ 20 ]. PBS and other polyesters showed very similar performance, with characteristic ferrimagnetic behavior resulting in magnetization with a saturation at around 0.2 T. Saturation values showed good scalability from 0.70 ± 0.1 emu·g −1 at 1 wt.% to 7.1 ± 0.1 emu·g −1 at 10 wt.% loading.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%