2021
DOI: 10.3390/polym13111871
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic Superporous Poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) Hydrogel Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering

Abstract: Magnetic maghemite (γ-Fe2O3) nanoparticles obtained by a coprecipitation of iron chlorides were dispersed in superporous poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) scaffolds containing continuous pores prepared by the polymerization of 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) and ethylene dimethacrylate (EDMA) in the presence of ammonium oxalate porogen. The scaffolds were thoroughly characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), vibrating sample magnetometry, FTIR spectroscopy, and mechanical testing in terms of chemi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(42 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, the peak at 2883 cm −1 to 2957 cm −1 corresponds to the –CH stretching of methyl (–CH 3 ) and methylene (–CH 2 –) moieties. 24 The peak corresponding to carboxylic groups appeared at 1692 cm −1 and –CH bending vibrational peaks were noted at 1455 cm −1 . It should be noted that, due to the absence of nitrogen (N) groups in the composite, we did not observe the functional groups derived from N (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Further, the peak at 2883 cm −1 to 2957 cm −1 corresponds to the –CH stretching of methyl (–CH 3 ) and methylene (–CH 2 –) moieties. 24 The peak corresponding to carboxylic groups appeared at 1692 cm −1 and –CH bending vibrational peaks were noted at 1455 cm −1 . It should be noted that, due to the absence of nitrogen (N) groups in the composite, we did not observe the functional groups derived from N (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…73 The advantages of natural hydrogels are good biocompatibility and biodegradability, while a disadvantage is potential immunogenicity and relatively weak mechanical strength. Synthetic hydrogels, which are composed of manufactured synthetic polymers, including PVA, 38,52 PEG, 39 PEDOT, 54 PHEMA 31,74 and PNIPAM, 75 have the advantage of good mechanical properties, while a disadvantage is that they have relatively weak biocompatibility and degradability. Composite hydrogels are a combination of natural and synthetic polymers.…”
Section: Classification Of Hydrogelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hydrogels that are magnetic and those that are sensitive to the magnetic field are usually obtained by introducing into ferromagnetic fillers (FMFs), such as Fe [ 17 ], Ni [ 18 ], Co [ 19 ], Fe 2 O 3 [ 20 ], Fe 3 O 4 , into the hydrophilic polymer matrix [ 21 ]. Magnetic properties, in combination with biocompatibility and sorption capacity, provide unique functional capabilities to composite hydrogels, which are used in a wide range of practical applications in the biomedical engineering field [ 22 ], including tissue engineering [ 23 ], drug delivery and release [ 24 ], cancer therapy [ 25 ], biosensors [ 26 ], etc. FMF-filled hydrogels, due to their unique properties and ability to respond to external stimuli of various natures, are ideal materials for the manufacture of detectors and sensors [ 16 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%