2000
DOI: 10.1161/01.str.31.3.680
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic Resonance Perfusion Imaging in Acute Ischemic Stroke Using Continuous Arterial Spin Labeling

Abstract: Background and Purpose-Continuous arterial spin-labeled perfusion MRI (CASL-PI) uses electromagnetically labeled arterial blood water as a diffusible tracer to noninvasively measure cerebral blood flow (CBF). We hypothesized that CASL-PI could detect perfusion deficits and perfusion/diffusion mismatches and predict outcome in acute ischemic stroke. Methods-We studied 15 patients with acute ischemic stroke within 24 hours of symptom onset. With the use of a 6-minute imaging protocol, CASL-PI was measured at 1.5… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
402
1
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 457 publications
(412 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
7
402
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For each subject, a mean ASL image was formed from the average difference of the control and tag images using surround subtraction to create an uncorrected perfusion time series, and slice timing delays were accounted for, making the inversion time (TI2) slice specific (Liu and Wong, 2005). This mean ASL image was then converted to absolute units of CBF (mL/100 g tissue per minute) using an estimate of the equilibrium magnetization of CSF as a reference signal (Chalela et al, 2000). This resulted in a calibrated perfusion value for each voxel.…”
Section: Data Processing and Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each subject, a mean ASL image was formed from the average difference of the control and tag images using surround subtraction to create an uncorrected perfusion time series, and slice timing delays were accounted for, making the inversion time (TI2) slice specific (Liu and Wong, 2005). This mean ASL image was then converted to absolute units of CBF (mL/100 g tissue per minute) using an estimate of the equilibrium magnetization of CSF as a reference signal (Chalela et al, 2000). This resulted in a calibrated perfusion value for each voxel.…”
Section: Data Processing and Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where CBF is the flow in mL/g/sec, DM is the difference between the control and labeled image intensities, w is the postlabeling delay, T1 a is the T1 of arterial blood (1.70 sec for Hct ¼ 0.4), TE is the echo time (14 msec), T2* a is the T2* of arterial blood (50 msec) (21), r is the density of brain tissue (1.05 g/mL) (22), M 0a is the equilibrium magnetization of arterial blood for which an average scanner value was used that was calculated according to Chalela et al (23), a the labeling efficiency (0.85 for p-CASL), T1 b is the T1 of brain tissue (1.24 sec), d is the transit time from the labeling region to the tissue compartment (tissue arrival time) (assumed to be 1500 msec), and t is the tagging duration (1650 msec) (15,24,25).…”
Section: Quantificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 3 ASL image pairs were averaged and smoothed with a 3-D isotropical kernel of size 6mm. CBF values were derived from the averaged ASL image pair using a modified one-compartment model (Chalela et al, 2000). CBF maps showing spuriously low values (<20 ml/100g/min for whole brain) suggested ineffective labeling and were discarded.…”
Section: Data Preprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%