Intra-and multicenter reproducibility of currently used arterial spin labeling (ASL) methods were assessed at three imaging centers in the Netherlands, equipped with Philips 3TMR scanners. Six healthy participants were scanned twice at each site. The imaging protocol consisted of continuous ASL (CASL), pseudo-continuous ASL (p-CASL) with and without background suppression, pulsed ASL (PASL) with single and multiple inversion times (TIs), and selective ASL for segmentation. Reproducibility was expressed in terms of the coefficient of repeatability and the repeatability index. Voxelwise analysis of variance was performed, yielding brain maps that reflected regional variability. Intra-and multicenter reproducibility were comparable for all methods, except for single TI PASL, with better intracenter reproducibility (F-test of equality of two variances, P < 0.05). Pseudocontinuous ASL and multi TI PASL varied least between sites. Variability maps of all methods showed most variability near brain-feeding arteries within sessions and in gray matter between sessions. On the basis of the results of this study, one could consider the use of reference values in clinical routine, with whole-brain p-CASL perfusion varying < 20% over repeated measurements within the same individuals considered to be normal. Knowledge on regional variability allows for the use of perfusion-weighted images in the assessment of local cerebral pathology.

Purpose: To evaluate the applicability of arterial spin labeling (ASL) cerebral blood flow (CBF) measurements in children with sickle cell disease (SCD). Materials and Methods:We included 12 patients and five controls. Conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (T2, fluid attenuated inversion recovery [FLAIR], and MR angiography) was performed to diagnose silent infarcts, vasculopathy, or leukoencephalopathy. Pseudo-continuous ASL was performed to measure CBF using two postlabeling delays to identify transit-time effects. Perfusion estimates were corrected for hematocrit and blood velocity in the labeling plane and compared to phase-contrast MR. CBF asymmetries between the flow maps of the left and right internal carotid arteries were tested for significance using paired t-tests. Significant asymmetries were expressed in terms of an asymmetry ratio (AR ¼ absolute difference/mean). An AR >10% was considered clinically relevant.Results: Mean CBF was higher in patients than in controls. Agreement between CBF and flow improved after applying hematocrit and velocity corrections. At a 2100 msec postlabeling delay one patient had a clinically relevant asymmetry. No association was observed between CBF asymmetries and silent infarcts. Conclusion:Care must be taken in the interpretation of ASL-CBF measurements in SCD patients. A long postlabeling delay with blood velocity correction anticipates overestimation of CBF asymmetries.

No abstract

Flow-territory mapping by MR imaging ASL noninvasively provides a unique insight into the distribution of cerebral perfusion. The introduction of planning-free vessel-encoded pCASL made flow-territory mapping feasible for clinical use, though lack of individual planning could impede reproducibility of this technique. We assessed the reproducibility of planning-free vessel-encoded pCASL in patients and controls. Results indicated that planning-free vessel-encoded pCASL is a reproducible method that could assist in clinical decision-making.

SUMMARY:Arterial spin-labeling (ASL) is a relatively new and noninvasive MR imaging technique, used to measure cerebral blood flow (CBF). Scanning time and reproducibility remain important issues in the clinical applicability of ASL. We expected both to benefit from higher field strengths. We describe that when performing ASL at 3T, 20 averages suffice to obtain steady and reproducible CBF values. Scanning time can be as short as 3 minutes.A rterial spin labeling (ASL) is a noninvasive MR imaging technique, used for visualization and quantification of cerebral perfusion. Cerebral blood flow (CBF) values measured by ASL are comparable with CBF values measured by conventional techniques (eg, positron-emission tomography or susceptibility-weighted MR imaging). ASL is based on magnetic labeling of arterial blood water protons, which are used as an endogenous tracer of flow. Magnetic inversion takes place in a plane proximal to the brain. The decay rate of the labeled spins is sufficiently long to visualize perfusion of brain vasculature and microvasculature. Perfusion images are obtained by subtraction of successively acquired labeled and nonlabeled control images. In general, 40 to 60 paired acquisitions are averaged to improve perfusion signal intensity. ASL sequences differ in the way magnetic labeling is applied and are commonly classified as continuous or pulsed ASL (CASL or PASL, respectively). In CASL, continuous adiabatic inversion of spins is applied. In PASL, labeling is performed at once over a wide spatial range. Pseudocontinuous ASL (pCASL) has been introduced recently and uses a series of discrete labeling pulses. 1-8Despite its advantages, scanning time and reproducibility remain important issues in the clinical applicability of ASL. The use of higher-field strengths could overcome these issues because of increased signal-to-noise ratio, prolonged T1-weighted relaxation time of labeled blood, and better spatial and temporal resolution. 7,9 We hypothesized that scanning time of the CASL sequence can be reduced at 3T because fewer averages might suffice to obtain steady and reproducible CBF values. Our primary objective was to assess the number of averages needed to obtain steady and reproducible CBF values with use of 3T CASL.Also, we hypothesized that acquisition-related reproducibility of ASL will improve at higher-field strengths, whereas physiology-related reproducibility will not change. Previous CASL reproducibility studies were performed at 1.5T with test-retest timeframes of at least 1 hour. 4,6,10 Measurement of reproducibility within scans would be more valuable to assess physiologic variations. Our secondary objective was to assess 3T CASL reproducibility within scans (intrascan Ϸ 4 minutes), within sessions (intrasession Ϸ 10 minutes), and between sessions (intersession Ϸ 1 to 3 weeks). TechniqueAfter approval of the local ethics committee and written informed consent from all volunteers, we scanned 10 volunteers (5 men; age range, 25-33 years) without known cerebrovascular disease during 3...