1983
DOI: 10.1016/0304-8853(83)90732-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic and Mössbauer studies of Co adsorbed γ-Fe2O3

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
1

Year Published

1989
1989
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…8 Considering surface vs in-volume effects, most studies are devoted to ferrimagnetic nanoparticles, where unlike in AF NPs, surface is the origin of a reduction in the magnetic moment. These studies are not unanimous with some authors claiming the preferential surface canting 9,10 in disagreement with others where finite-size/in-volume effects are observed. 11,12 Studies comparing surfactant-coated particles with uncoated ones show that the magnetic properties are greatly affected by the surfactant-particle interaction, suggesting the surface nature of this phenomena.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…8 Considering surface vs in-volume effects, most studies are devoted to ferrimagnetic nanoparticles, where unlike in AF NPs, surface is the origin of a reduction in the magnetic moment. These studies are not unanimous with some authors claiming the preferential surface canting 9,10 in disagreement with others where finite-size/in-volume effects are observed. 11,12 Studies comparing surfactant-coated particles with uncoated ones show that the magnetic properties are greatly affected by the surfactant-particle interaction, suggesting the surface nature of this phenomena.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…Whereas M s (D,T a ) of FM nanocrystals decreases with dropping D, remarkable reductions of M s (D,T a ) of Fe-Ni invar alloy (< 40 nm) [144], Ni thin films [145,146] and Fe, Co and Ni nanoparticles [147] Since then, the problem has been revisited with arguments in favor of a surface origin [157] and in favor of a finite size effect [158]. However, no clear conclusions about it have been given yet [159].…”
Section: Magnetizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In more recent works devoted to the study of different ferrimagnetic oxides-␥-Fe 2 O 3 , NiFe 2 O 4 , CoFe 2 O 4 , CuFe 2 O 4 , in the form of nanometric particles [1][2][3][4][5] -a random spin canting at the surface, caused by competing antiferromagnetic ͑AF͒ interactions, was observed by Mössbauer spectroscopy, 2 polarized 4 and inelastic 6 neutron scattering, and ferromagnetic ͑FM͒ resonance. 7 The origin of this noncollinear arrangement of the spins was discussed by several authors supporting the surface 2,[8][9][10] or the finite-size explanations, [11][12][13][14][15] but up to the moment no clear conclusions have been established.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%