2001
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.63.184416
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite-size and surface effects in maghemite nanoparticles:  Monte Carlo simulations

Abstract: Finite-size and surface effects in fine particle systems are investigated by Monte Carlo simulation of a model of a ␥-Fe 2 O 3 ͑maghemite͒ single particle. Periodic boundary conditions for a large enough system have been used to simulate the bulk properties and the results compared with those for a spherical shaped particle with free boundaries to evidence the role played by the surface on the anomalous magnetic properties displayed by these systems at low temperatures. Several outcomes of the model are in qua… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
155
2
5

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 261 publications
(181 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(105 reference statements)
17
155
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…However now, due to the dominant AF intersublattice coupling, there is a tendency to achieve antiparallel alignment among spins in different sublattices that causes a greater degree of disorder at the surface with respect to the FM case. Notice also that, even for small k S , M z does not approach 1 as T tends to zero as in the FM case, but instead tends to the value of magnetization of the noncompensated spins (M U nc = (N O − N T )/N T otal ), that for a particle of diameter D = 3 is M U nc = 0.285(0.412) for surface (core) spins [11]. Moreover, for the ferrimagnetic particle, there is a change in the magnetic order at low T as the k S /k C ratio increases.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However now, due to the dominant AF intersublattice coupling, there is a tendency to achieve antiparallel alignment among spins in different sublattices that causes a greater degree of disorder at the surface with respect to the FM case. Notice also that, even for small k S , M z does not approach 1 as T tends to zero as in the FM case, but instead tends to the value of magnetization of the noncompensated spins (M U nc = (N O − N T )/N T otal ), that for a particle of diameter D = 3 is M U nc = 0.285(0.412) for surface (core) spins [11]. Moreover, for the ferrimagnetic particle, there is a change in the magnetic order at low T as the k S /k C ratio increases.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…which is an extension of our previous study with Ising spins [11]. Here, S i are three dimensional classical vector spins placed on a discrete lattice and H is the magnetic field, that in the following will be given in temperature units as h = µ H/k B , with µ the moment of the magnetic ion.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, current experimental techniques do not allow to probe sur-face microscopic structure in geometries such as those of a nanoparticle, a fact that forces to assume phenomenological models for surface anisotropy. Monte Carlo (MC) simulations constitute a benchmark to probe different models since, by modeling magnetic ions as classical [5,6,7,8] or Ising spins [9,10,11], the interatomic interactions, the local magnetic anisotropy directions and the values of anisotropy constants can be easily varied while taking into account the exact geometry of the underlying lattice of magnetic ions. Here, we will present results of MC simulations aimed to understand the influence of surface anisotropy on the magnetic properties and hysteresis of a single nanoparticle, neglecting the effects of interactions with other particles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As we note, these curves characterize a ferromagnetic behavior with a critical temperature T c = (1.29 ± 0.02)J/k B . As we can see in Fig.2, the critical temperature (actually the pseudocritical temperature [10]) increases with the size of the particle [10,19] up to reach the thermodynamic limit. In our case this limit is easily found for a particle with nine shells, where we obtain T c = (1.44±0.02)J/k B , which is very close to the value obtained for a ferromagnetic system [20].…”
Section: Results and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 89%