2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10533-015-0080-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Macrophyte root and rhizome decay: the impact of nutrient enrichment and the use of live versus dead tissue in decomposition studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Senescent biomass of wetland macrophytes is the ultimate source of carbon for sediment microorganisms, and through leaching as dissolved organic matter (DOM) it can reach and impact adjacent water bodies. The difference in phenolic content of macrophyte litter can have important implications for processes such as decomposition (Snyder and Rejmánková 2015), yet despite its potential importance, data on phenolic and lignin concentrations in emergent macrophytes are very rare. Both phenolic and lignin values found in this study are low.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Senescent biomass of wetland macrophytes is the ultimate source of carbon for sediment microorganisms, and through leaching as dissolved organic matter (DOM) it can reach and impact adjacent water bodies. The difference in phenolic content of macrophyte litter can have important implications for processes such as decomposition (Snyder and Rejmánková 2015), yet despite its potential importance, data on phenolic and lignin concentrations in emergent macrophytes are very rare. Both phenolic and lignin values found in this study are low.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was a result of increasing biomass (growth) and decreasing N and P concentrations (Fig. 6), probably caused by active retranslocation of N and P even before maximum length was reached (Snyder & Rejmánková, 2015). If harvesting is done when culms reach the maximum amount of N and P stored (and not when they are fully grown), N and P removal through harvesting can increase by almost 50%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the dead leaves of the E. vaginatum decomposed faster than its dead roots. This discrepancy between live and dead plant material when comparing leaf and root decomposition illustrates that live roots may not necessarily be a good predictor of dead root decomposition, particularly for E. vaginatum roots, and that conclusions about decomposition based on live tissues of different plants should be treated with caution, especially if species differ in characteristics such as nutrient resorption efficiency (Scheffer and Aerts, 2000;Snyder and Rejmánková, 2015).…”
Section: Decomposition Of Leaves and Roots Of The Two Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%