2019
DOI: 10.3390/jcm9010005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine Learning of Infant Spontaneous Movements for the Early Prediction of Cerebral Palsy: A Multi-Site Cohort Study

Abstract: Background: Early identification of cerebral palsy (CP) during infancy will provide opportunities for early therapies and treatments. The aim of the present study was to present a novel machine-learning model, the Computer-based Infant Movement Assessment (CIMA) model, for clinically feasible early CP prediction based on infant video recordings. Methods: The CIMA model was designed to assess the proportion (%) of CP risk-related movements using a time-frequency decomposition of the movement trajectories of the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
96
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
3
96
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the cases considered so far, the prevalence of fidgety movements in newborns from the age of two months has been considered more frequently, especially in the context of early detection of the risk of cerebral palsy [ 35 ]. An approach similar to that presented in this study was used by Ihnen et al [ 27 ], who analyzed cerebral palsy prediction in a large group of recordings of children over nine weeks of age. Their training set was built based on the classification of the entire recordings, and then each 5 s of the recording were classified.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the cases considered so far, the prevalence of fidgety movements in newborns from the age of two months has been considered more frequently, especially in the context of early detection of the risk of cerebral palsy [ 35 ]. An approach similar to that presented in this study was used by Ihnen et al [ 27 ], who analyzed cerebral palsy prediction in a large group of recordings of children over nine weeks of age. Their training set was built based on the classification of the entire recordings, and then each 5 s of the recording were classified.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In individual studies, authors have attempted to identify irregularities, mostly by reducing the problem to the classification of the recording into the normal and abnormal groups. The proposed solutions can be divided according to the method of the extraction of features describing the child’s movement into those based on features extracted directly from the recording (optical flow, background subtraction) [ 25 , 26 ] and pose-based features, in which the extraction of features is preceded by the process of locating individual body segments [ 27 , 28 ]. Currently, the extraction capabilities of pose-based features have improved due to the availability of ready-made human pose estimation libraries such as OpenPose [ 29 ], whose accuracy in the case of infant movement analysis has been confirmed in various studies [ 28 , 30 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, Random Forest and AdaBoost seem to be a good choice of classifier, but the method lacks kinematic features that could be introduced by using depth cameras. A new model called Computer-based Infant Movement Assessment (CIMA) was introduced and evaluated on even more infants (377 high-risk infants) by Ihlen et al [ 18 ]. The 1–5 min video recording of 9–15 weeks corrected age infants were used to predict CP.…”
Section: Methodology Of the Reviewed Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result of the nominal use of GMA in neonatal follow-up programs, several studies have tried to automate this method. These studies are based on either indirect sensing using visual sensors (2D or 3D video) [ 7 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 24 ], direct sensing using motion sensors [ 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 ], or both [ 32 , 33 , 34 ]. They have shown excellent results, however, they lack full automation and also have several fundamental limitations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation