2022
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.21325
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Method to Predict Cerebral Palsy From Spontaneous Movements in Infants at High Risk

Abstract: Key Points Question What is the external validity of a deep learning–based method to predict cerebral palsy (CP) based on infants’ spontaneous movements at 9 to 18 weeks’ corrected age? Findings In this prognostic study of 557 infants with a high risk of perinatal brain injury, a deep learning–based method for early prediction of CP had sensitivity of 71%, specificity of 94%, positive predictive value of 68%, and negative predictive value of 95%. Prognosis … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
(150 reference statements)
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent evidence supports the hypothesis that epigenetic phenomena, including DNA methylation, histone modifications, and regulatory noncoding RNAs, may contribute to musculoskeletal abnormalities of spastic CP [31]. A novel deep learning-based method may early identify CP at at least 12 months, based on videos of infants' spontaneous movements at 9-18 weeks with predictive accuracy on external validation, but it was not focused on spasticity prediction [32].…”
Section: Prediction Of Spasticitymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Recent evidence supports the hypothesis that epigenetic phenomena, including DNA methylation, histone modifications, and regulatory noncoding RNAs, may contribute to musculoskeletal abnormalities of spastic CP [31]. A novel deep learning-based method may early identify CP at at least 12 months, based on videos of infants' spontaneous movements at 9-18 weeks with predictive accuracy on external validation, but it was not focused on spasticity prediction [32].…”
Section: Prediction Of Spasticitymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Infants had a video from GCA 9 to 18 weeks assessed with the General Movement Assessment and were evaluated for a diagnosis of CP after GCA 12 months. Overall, the DL model had a sensitivity of 71.4% (95% CI, 47.8%-88.7%) and specificity of 94.1% (95% CI, 88.2%-97.6%) . Furthermore, the DL method differentiated among infants who developed ambulatory and nonambulatory CP, as well as unilateral and bilateral CP …”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Overall, the DL model had a sensitivity of 71.4% (95% CI, 47.8%-88.7%) and specificity of 94.1% (95% CI, 88.2%-97.6%) . Furthermore, the DL method differentiated among infants who developed ambulatory and nonambulatory CP, as well as unilateral and bilateral CP …”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The potential of these techniques for a clinical purpose within CP has been shown recently for the early detection of CP in infants at risk (Groos et al, 2022) or the predicting of gait parameters from common videos in ambulatory children with CP (Kidzinski et al, 2020). To our knowledge, automated video-based assessment has not yet been applied to complex movement disorders, such as dystonia in dyskinetic CP (Haberfehlner et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%