1992
DOI: 10.2466/pr0.1992.71.1.57
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machiavellianism and Business Education

Abstract: The Mach IV test was administered to 206 undergraduate university students to compare business with nonbusiness students and to compare business students majoring in different fields, such as Marketing, Human Resource Management, and Accounting and Finance. Analysis partially supported the common stereotype that business students, and marketing students in particular, are more Machiavellian than are nonbusiness students.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Partly supporting our hypotheses about majoring in economics, we found selection but not socialization effects for studying economics. The selection effects explain why previous studies found higher levels of Mach in economics students (McLean & Jones, 1992;Skinner, 1981; but see also Li-Ping Tang et al, 2008) and are in accordance with the low communal and high agentic motivation of people high in Mach and their motivation to achieve financial success (McHoskey, 1999).…”
Section: Machiavellianismsupporting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Partly supporting our hypotheses about majoring in economics, we found selection but not socialization effects for studying economics. The selection effects explain why previous studies found higher levels of Mach in economics students (McLean & Jones, 1992;Skinner, 1981; but see also Li-Ping Tang et al, 2008) and are in accordance with the low communal and high agentic motivation of people high in Mach and their motivation to achieve financial success (McHoskey, 1999).…”
Section: Machiavellianismsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…We focused on the relationship between studying economics and the development of narcissistic admiration and Mach because several studies on university education entertain the idea that tertiary business and economics education can influence students’ narcissistic and antisocial tendencies (e.g., Etzioni, 2015; Westerman, Bergman, Bergman, & Daly, 2012). This idea is based on (a) studies finding economics university students to be higher in narcissism (Westerman et al, 2012) and Mach (McLean & Jones, 1992; Skinner, 1981; but see also Li-Ping Tang, Chen, & Sutarso, 2008) than students in other majors and (b) studies suggesting that studying economics at university fosters immoral tendencies (for a review, see Etzioni, 2015). For example, students who attended a class on game theory became more cynical and less honest—which is highly consistent with Mach—over the course of one semester than students who attended an astronomy class (Frank, Gilovich, & Regan, 1993).…”
Section: Experiences Related To Changes In Narcissistic Admiration An...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They may also utilize induce guilt feeling to other people [28]. Earlier literature suggests that business students tend to be more Machiavellian than non-business students [29]. The requirement is not without any reason.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%