“…As Napoletano et al identify, this approach to the dialectic is carried through into Lefebvre's later writings on everyday life, the production of space, and rhythm analysis, and his longstanding concern with the dialectical relationship between non-human nature and social life is crucial for understanding how his thought can contribute to contemporary ecological politics. This attention to the continuity of themes throughout Lefebvre's writing echoes a dominant approach taken within much of the secondary literature on his work during the last three decades (Butler, 2012;Elden, 2004;Merrifield, 2006;Shields, 1999;Stanek, 2011). It is central to the authors' argument that Lefebvre avoids both classical humanism's 'dualistic' conceptualisation of society and nature as well as the 'flat' ontologies that are associated with much recent posthumanist and more-than-human scholarship (Ash, 2020;Marston et al, 2005).…”