1996
DOI: 10.1117/12.258114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<title>Blackbody emissivity considerations for radiometric calibration of the MODIS Airborne Simulator (MAS) thermal channels</title>

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The SRF measurements are used to convert the temperatures of the two onboard MAS blackbodies to equivalent Planck radiances. An emissivity correction to the MAS blackbodies is also applied [Moeller et al, 1996]. In the reflectance bands, the SRF is used with integrating sphere measurements (in the laboratory) to compute a calibration slope and offset for application to inflight data [King et al, 1996].…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The SRF measurements are used to convert the temperatures of the two onboard MAS blackbodies to equivalent Planck radiances. An emissivity correction to the MAS blackbodies is also applied [Moeller et al, 1996]. In the reflectance bands, the SRF is used with integrating sphere measurements (in the laboratory) to compute a calibration slope and offset for application to inflight data [King et al, 1996].…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Retrievals of cirrus cloud properties from satellite-measured radiances are especially difficult because of the wide range of cirrus heights, particle sizes [Heymsfield and Platt, 1984 An emissivity correction to the MAS blackbodies is also applied [Moeller et al, 1996]. In the reflectance bands, the SRF is used with integrating sphere measurements (in the laboratory) to compute a calibration slope and offset for application to inflight data [King et al, 1996].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent modifications to the MAS have included heating elements, insulation, and airflow barriers. The 3.7-m and thermal channels are calibrated in flight with two onboard blackbody panels, at ambient (cold) and warm temperatures, with empirical emissivity corrections (Moeller et al 1996). The 3.7-m retrieval is less sensitive to reflectance errors, with a Ϯ10% uncertainty in the inferred reflectance roughly corresponding to an equivalent Ϯ10% uncertainty in retrieval size (see Platnick and Valero 1995).…”
Section: A Modis Airborne Simulator Retrievalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of ε b ͑0.98 for short-wave IR channels and 0.94 for longwave IR channels͒ was determined by regression analysis of the laboratory observations of a thermally controlled external source in a stable ambient environment. We measured the spectral emissivity of the Krylon ultraflat black paint that was used to paint the MAS blackbodies and compared it with the spectral emissivity of another Krylon ultraflat black paint sample prepared and measured by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory ASTER ͑Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission Reflectance Radiometer͒ team ͑data available as ultra flat black paint 1602.txt from http:͞͞speclib.jpl.nasa.gov͒͞ and the effective emissivities ͑Table 2 of Moeller et al 8 ͒ in Fig. 4.…”
Section: The Equation For Nonunit Emissivity Calibration Of Mas Thermmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the preliminary MAS level 1B processing, the calibration of MAS TIR data was based on the effective blackbody emissivity values determined by regression analysis of the laboratory observations of a thermally controlled external source in a stable ambient environment. 8 The operational calibration of the MAS TIR channels is accomplished through in-flight observations of two onboard blackbody sources and the use of the instrument characteristics ͑in particular, the blackbody emissivity͒ determined from preflight calibration activities in the laboratory. Because during flights the MAS performs in a different environment from the laboratory environment and the MAS is a complicated instrument, any unexpected thermal deformation, small changes in its optical alignment, and other factors may affect its calibration performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%