2017
DOI: 10.4025/actascibiolsci.v39i2.33187
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<b>Useful woody species and its environmental availability: the case of artisanal fishermen in Itaúnas, Brazil

Abstract: ABSTRACT. Ethnobotanical studies involve research with human societies and their different interaction with plants, and the quantitative approaches from thes estudies are important to select conservation priority of species in natural environment. This research aims to quantify use-values for woody plants mentioned by fishers in Itaúnas, state of Espírito Santo, and evaluate the relationship between use-values and species availability (absolute density and frequency, and importance value) in two distinct resti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2). All of them focused on timber and food uses (Clement, Cristo-Araújo, Eeckenbrugge, Pereira, & Picanço-Rodrigues, 2010;Lopes, Crepaldi, & Lobão, 2017;de Freitas et al, 2018).…”
Section: Literature Reviewedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2). All of them focused on timber and food uses (Clement, Cristo-Araújo, Eeckenbrugge, Pereira, & Picanço-Rodrigues, 2010;Lopes, Crepaldi, & Lobão, 2017;de Freitas et al, 2018).…”
Section: Literature Reviewedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, the importance of plant resources has been evaluated quantitatively through ethnobotanical indices, with use value (UV) being the most widely used indicator (Phillips & Gentry 1993a,b, Ribeiro et al 2014, Shaheen et al 2015, Kunwar et al 2016, Lopes et al 2017. The use of plant resources is influenced by socioeconomic factors, with age, gender, schooling, language and economic activity being the most influential (Saynes-Vásquez et al 2013, Andriamparany et al 2014, Laleye et al 2015, Segnon et al 2015, Kunwar et al 2018.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%