2015
DOI: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v37i2.25847
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<b>Slaughter weight did not alter carcass characteristics and meat quality of crossbred heifers supplemented and finished in a pasture system

Abstract: This work was carried out to evaluate the animal performance, carcass characteristics and meat quality of crossbred heifers slaughtered at three different body weights. The heifers were slaughtered with 330 (Light), 360 (Medium) and 400 (Heavy) kg body weight. The final weight, average daily gain and carcass weight were greater for HEA heifers, intermediate for MED heifers and lower for LIG heifers. However, carcass dressing and pH were similar for the three heifers groups. Dripping loss, dissection loss and t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the losses observed in this experiment are consistent with losses considered normal (Andreotti et al, 2015). Feedlot studies carried out with crossbred heifers in feedlot have reported muscle, fat, and bone percentages ranging from 56% to 62%, 20% to 25%, and 16% to 19%, respectively (Andreotti et al, 2015). Thus, the muscle, fat, and bone percentages obtained in this study can be considered normal for these animal categories.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, the losses observed in this experiment are consistent with losses considered normal (Andreotti et al, 2015). Feedlot studies carried out with crossbred heifers in feedlot have reported muscle, fat, and bone percentages ranging from 56% to 62%, 20% to 25%, and 16% to 19%, respectively (Andreotti et al, 2015). Thus, the muscle, fat, and bone percentages obtained in this study can be considered normal for these animal categories.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…In general, carcass shrink losses in industry range from 1.5% to 2.0% after 24 h of chilling which is in agreement with the present study. Thus, the losses observed in this experiment are consistent with losses considered normal (Andreotti et al, 2015). Feedlot studies carried out with crossbred heifers in feedlot have reported muscle, fat, and bone percentages ranging from 56% to 62%, 20% to 25%, and 16% to 19%, respectively (Andreotti et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The finishing time of animals ranged from 111.9 to 176.3 days and was linearly correlated with increasing slaughter weight, and the increase in average daily weight gain was not sufficient to reduce the finishing time. The increase in average daily weight gain relative to animal live weight observed in this study is generally not seen in bulls and cows (Costa et al, 2002a;Andreotti et al, 2015;Missio et al, 2015). The reduction in daily weight gain typical of older animals is primarily due to the higher energy demands of physiological maintenance and by the greater energy demand related to the composition of the weight gained.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…The fat thickness was not influenced (P > 0.05) by the essential oils and active principles added to the diets (Table 2). In general, the fat thickness of feedlot-finished heifers is above 5 mm (Andreotti et al, 2015;Marques et al, 2010). According to the cattle marketing practices in Brazil, the fat thickness must be between 36 mm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%