2007 IEEE International Conference on Communications 2007
DOI: 10.1109/icc.2007.115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-Complexity, Low-Memory EMS Algorithm for Non-Binary LDPC Codes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
55
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [12], QSPA algorithms are used for three serial non-binary LDPC decoders. In [13], EMS decoder was designed for non -binary LDPC codes utilizing Minimum -sum algorithm. This decoder was mainly designed to address the memory problem as well as to minimize the decoding iteration.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [12], QSPA algorithms are used for three serial non-binary LDPC decoders. In [13], EMS decoder was designed for non -binary LDPC codes utilizing Minimum -sum algorithm. This decoder was mainly designed to address the memory problem as well as to minimize the decoding iteration.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The complexity of FFT-QSPA is on the order of O(p2 p ), whereas the straightforward implementation of the BP algorithm [3] has complexity on the order of O (2 2p ). Recently, reference [9] presented a low-complexity, low-memory decoding algorithm for LDPC codes over GF (2 p ), which has complexity on the order of O(n m log n m ) where n m 2 p . The complexity of the decoder in [9] is comparable to that of a binary decoder.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, reference [9] presented a low-complexity, low-memory decoding algorithm for LDPC codes over GF (2 p ), which has complexity on the order of O(n m log n m ) where n m 2 p . The complexity of the decoder in [9] is comparable to that of a binary decoder. An universal linear-complexity encoding algorithm for any cycle GF(2 p ) code is available in [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [24] the authors evaluate implementation costs for various values of q by the extension of the layered decoder to the NB case. An architecture for a parallel or serial implementation of the EMS decoder is proposed in [16]. Also, the implementation of the Min-Max decoder is considered in [25], [26] and optimized in [27] for GF (32).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This algorithm is also described in the logarithm domain [14], leading to the so-called log-BP-FFT. In [15] [16], the authors introduce the Extended Min-Sum (EMS), which is based on a generalization of the Min-Sum algorithm used for binary LDPC codes ( [17], [18] and [19]). Its principle is the truncation of the vector messages from q to n m values (n m << q), introducing a performance degradation compared to the BP algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%