2015
DOI: 10.1080/17533171.2015.1022415
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Looking at the Other/Seeing the Self: Embodied Performance and Encounter in Brett Bailey’s Exhibit B and Nineteenth-Century Ethnographic Displays

Abstract: The version in the Kent Academic Repository may differ from the final published version. Users are advised to check http://kar.kent.ac.uk for the status of the paper. Users should always cite the published version of record.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A substantial literature on living displays of indigenous people, commonly known as ethnographic shows or "human zoos," argues that these performances offered Western audiences a palpable experience of their supposed racial and civilizational superiority. By portraying indigenous people as "savages" and placing them at a lower stage of human development, these shows served to justify Western imperial expansion (Atkin 2015;Ellis 2013;Lindfors 1999a;Manderson 2018;Mathur 2001;Purkayastha 2019;Qureshi , 2012aQureshi , 2012bRydell 1993;Vaughan 1996;Vinson and Edgar 2007;Welch 2011;Wiss 1994). The juxtaposition of non-European "savagery" and "barbarism" with modern technological achievements at a series of world's fairs and exhibitions (Mathur 2001;Rydell 1993;Vaughan 1996), as well as the performers' juxtaposition with audiences whose civilizational superiority as "modern man" they were meant to confirm, highlights modernity's inseparability from coloniality, as theorized by Walter Mignolo (2011).…”
Section: Across Local Contextsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A substantial literature on living displays of indigenous people, commonly known as ethnographic shows or "human zoos," argues that these performances offered Western audiences a palpable experience of their supposed racial and civilizational superiority. By portraying indigenous people as "savages" and placing them at a lower stage of human development, these shows served to justify Western imperial expansion (Atkin 2015;Ellis 2013;Lindfors 1999a;Manderson 2018;Mathur 2001;Purkayastha 2019;Qureshi , 2012aQureshi , 2012bRydell 1993;Vaughan 1996;Vinson and Edgar 2007;Welch 2011;Wiss 1994). The juxtaposition of non-European "savagery" and "barbarism" with modern technological achievements at a series of world's fairs and exhibitions (Mathur 2001;Rydell 1993;Vaughan 1996), as well as the performers' juxtaposition with audiences whose civilizational superiority as "modern man" they were meant to confirm, highlights modernity's inseparability from coloniality, as theorized by Walter Mignolo (2011).…”
Section: Across Local Contextsmentioning
confidence: 99%