2002
DOI: 10.1097/00000658-200210000-00015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-Term Results of Local Excision for Rectal Cancer

Abstract: Ten-year local recurrence and survival rates were 17% and 74% for T1 rectal cancers and 26% and 72% for T2 cancers. Median time to relapse was 1.4 years (range 0.4-7.0) for local recurrence and 2.5 years (0.8-7.5) for distant recurrence. In patients receiving radiotherapy, local recurrence was delayed (median 2.1 years vs. 1.1 years), but overall rates of local and overall recurrence and survival rates were similar to patients not receiving radiotherapy. Among 26 cancer deaths, 8 (28%) occurred more than 5 yea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
187
0
8

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 311 publications
(205 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
10
187
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…However, historical data on transanal excisions showed unacceptably high local recurrence rates (LR) (0-28.8 %) [11][12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, historical data on transanal excisions showed unacceptably high local recurrence rates (LR) (0-28.8 %) [11][12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 However, according to Paty et al, the local recurrence rate and diseasespecific survival rate at 10 years of follow-up are 17 and 74%, respectively, for SM cancer cases, and 26 and 72%, respectively, for MP cancer cases. 26 Appropriate informed consent and due caution are necessary for implementing local resection of SM massive or deeper cancers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is expected, since the risk of lymph node involvement for T2 and T3 rectal adenocarcinomas is high (12%-28% and 36%-79%, respectively 22,32,35 ). Concerning T2 lesions, Lee, et al 21 compared patients with T1N0M0 and T2N0M0 rectal adenocarcinomas treated by TEM alone (74 patients) or by radical surgery (100 patients).…”
Section: Locally Advanced Rectal Cancersmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…However, patients have to experience long operative time and are exposed to postoperative complications such as bleeding, suture dehiscence, temporary or definitive colostomy, sexual or urinary dysfunctions, pneumonia and thromboembolic events. In this context, TEM appeared as an attractive alternative, however precise preoperative staging is imperative since the procedure does not remove all perirectal lymph nodes (the risk of its involvement is 0%-12% for T1 cancers, 12%-28% for T2 cancers, 36%-79% for T3 cancers 25,32,35 ). Therefore, local recurrence is a major concern and careful patient selection is mandatory to optimize results.…”
Section: Malignant Lesionsmentioning
confidence: 99%