Long-Term Followup of Buccal Mucosa Onlay Graft for Hypospadias Repair: Analysis of Complications

Fichtner, Jan; Filipas, D.; Fisch, Margit; Hohenfellner, R.; Thüroff, Joachim W.

doi:10.1097/01.ju.0000142451.78966.fb

Cited by 67 publications

(39 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…which is more than that of Fichtner et al [13] in their 35 pts operated in one stage (20%) and that for the 14 cases operated in two stages (21%). Barbagli et al [18] reported the same success rate (82%) in both one stage and two stages which are better than that in this study.…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 44%

“…The reoperation rate (which used as a failure rate) was 9/32 (28,125%).This reoperation rate is nearly the same as that reported by Yerkes et al [12] (29%). Higher than that of Fichtner et al [13] (24%), that of Schoreder et al [14] (22.4%), far away from that of Amukele et al [15] (12%). But it is less than that of Metro et al [16], Nelson et al [4], and Irani et al [17] those reported (50%), (51%) and (50%) respectively.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 42%

“…One case respond to regular dilatation leaving 2 cases (6.25%) which respond will for VIU with no case need urethroplasty. These rates is better than that of Metro et al [16] (42.8%) and that of Nelson et al [4] (14%), near to that of Fichtner et al [13] (6.1%), worse than that of Amukele et al [15] (3.6%), Schoreder et al [14] (3.5%) and that of Yerkes et al [12], Hensle et al [5] and Irani et al [17] which reported (0%) stricture urethra.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 44%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Ventral Onlay Buccal Mucosa Graft in Complex Hypospadias Repair

Omran¹

2017

UNOAJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 44%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 42%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 44%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Ventral Onlay Buccal Mucosa Graft in Complex Hypospadias Repair

Omran¹

2017

UNOAJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Long-term (at least 5 years) success rates for single-stage BMG urethroplasty for repair of defects associated with hypospadias/epispadias and strictures were 84% [58] and 75% [59], respectively.…”

Section: Single-stage Versus Staged Urethroplastymentioning

confidence: 99%

Anterior Urethral Strictures: A Brief Review of the Current Surgical Treatment

Singh

Gupta

Arvind³

2010

Urol Int

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A review of the recent literature on the surgical management of anterior urethral stricture was performed. The literature was searched via PubMed using the search terms ‘urethral stricture’ and ‘urethroplasty’ from 1996 to 2009. The management of anterior urethral strictures is changing rapidly in the sense that the reconstructive procedures have evolved greatly. Penile skin, because of its location and because it is hairless, has been popular and used for a long time. Since the early 1990s, buccal mucosa graft (BMG) was introduced in urethral reconstructive surgery and has become the first choice of most practicing urologists. Recently, there has been an increase in the use of lingual mucosa graft with various doctors reporting easy harvesting and lesser morbidity in comparison to BMG. Also, fibrin glue has recently been used to fix the graft with promising results. With the success of tissue-engineered materials that are still in the experimental phase, the urologist would no longer be limited by the quantity of the graft. These substitutes will also boost the appealing scarless endoscopic urethroplasty. This article provides a brief up-to-date review of the main surgical techniques in the management of anterior urethral stricture disease for the contemporary practicing urologists. Present controversies have been given special emphasis. The possible future techniques and the future of the anterior urethral stricture surgery are also discussed in brief.

show abstract

“…Besides the tubularized incised plate technique [4] and the use of vascularized skin flaps, grafts of buccal mucosa have gained popularity for substitution urethroplasty in hypospadias repair since the 1990s [5][6][7]. Long-term results of buccal mucosa grafts for hypospadias repair are good, with acceptable complication rates [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. However, as in all surgical techniques, patient selection, appropriate indications and careful attention to surgical details are essential for improving the results and reducing complication rates.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%