2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2009.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term effects of poultry litter and conservation tillage on crop yields and soil phosphorus in cotton–cotton–corn rotation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
17
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
4
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These authors observed corn yield increases of 30% in relation to the treatment that received standard N fertilization rate during the prior year. Reddy et al (2009), when evaluating a cotton-cotton-corn rotation system with long-term poultry litter application, also observed residual effect on corn grain yield. Corn grown after cotton on residual poultry litter without fertilization showed higher grain yields (37 and 36%) when compared to the cotton treatments that received ammonium nitrate at the same rate in 2005 and 2008, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These authors observed corn yield increases of 30% in relation to the treatment that received standard N fertilization rate during the prior year. Reddy et al (2009), when evaluating a cotton-cotton-corn rotation system with long-term poultry litter application, also observed residual effect on corn grain yield. Corn grown after cotton on residual poultry litter without fertilization showed higher grain yields (37 and 36%) when compared to the cotton treatments that received ammonium nitrate at the same rate in 2005 and 2008, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, when the addition of nutrients to the soil from both fertilizer sources is considered, it is possible to infer that the organic fertilizer should be recommended since it is a source of more nutrients to the soil, with a difference between the 9,907 kg ha -1 litter level and the mineral fertilizer of 19, 206 and 314 kg ha -1 of N, P 2 O 5 and K 2 O, respectively. Therefore, besides costs, it is also important to consider the benefits of nutrient addition to the soil, the release and residual effect dynamics (Nyakatawa et al, 2001;Mitchell & Tu, 2005;Reddy et al, 2009), the effects on physical, chemical and biological soil traits (Eghball et al, 2004;McGrath et al, 2010) and the environmental impact of its usage, in order to make the best decision on which source to use.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the higher CO 2 emissions in AN-SI plots can be attributed to increased biomass production in the form of crop residues from N application which directly adds C to the soil, which upon decomposition, can result in soil emission of CO 2 . Our studies comparing PL to AN sources of N on a Decatur silt loam soil have shown that inorganic N application generally results in better plant growth rate and higher biomass production compared to PL at the same application rate in the short term (Nyakatawa and Reddy 2000;Reddy et al 2009). Paustian et al (2000) also reported that N application to the soil can increase mineralization rates of soil organic matter by increasing residue input, which may also increase CO 2 emission.…”
Section: Soil Carbon Dioxide (Co 2 ) Fluxesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The experiment was composed of three tillage methods (conventional-till, no-till, mulch-till), two cropping systems (cotton in summer-fallow in winter; cotton in summer-rye in winter) and two sources of nitrogen: poultry litter and ammonium nitrate. In total, there were twelve treatments laid out in a randomized complete block design with plot size of 8 m by 9 m having eight rows of crops [20]. There were three replicates from three blocks.…”
Section: Site Description and Field Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%