2013
DOI: 10.3945/ajcn.112.040766
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term effects of LCPUFA supplementation on childhood cognitive outcomes

Abstract: The data from this relatively small trial suggest that, although the effects of LCPUFAs may not always be evident on standardized developmental tasks at 18 mo, significant effects may emerge later on more specific or fine-grained tasks. The results imply that studies of nutrition and cognitive development should be powered to continue through early childhood. This parent trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00266825.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
176
1
5

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 161 publications
(190 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(46 reference statements)
8
176
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Another Swedish cohort study [34] of moderately preterm infants found positive associations between both AA and DHA in infant blood and global developmental outcomes at 18 months of age, but negative associations with n-6 PUFA and the n-6/n-3 PUFA ratio. The observed assocition between AA and language skills is in accordance with some previous studies of term infant showing negative associations between LC-PUFA intake or status and language development [26,46], but other studies found no effect [47,48]. The previous studies have primarily focused on the effect of supplementation with fish oil, DHA or DHA+AA.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another Swedish cohort study [34] of moderately preterm infants found positive associations between both AA and DHA in infant blood and global developmental outcomes at 18 months of age, but negative associations with n-6 PUFA and the n-6/n-3 PUFA ratio. The observed assocition between AA and language skills is in accordance with some previous studies of term infant showing negative associations between LC-PUFA intake or status and language development [26,46], but other studies found no effect [47,48]. The previous studies have primarily focused on the effect of supplementation with fish oil, DHA or DHA+AA.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…BSID-III is a global developmental test, designed to contrast developmental delay and normal psychomotor development. It is considered the golden standard for developmental testing of infants and is widely used in studies of LC-PUFA influences on early childhood development, but some researchers have pointed out that it may not be ideal for detecting minor variations within normality [47,[50][51][52][53][54].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two studies investigated the impact of DHA and ARA addition to IF on intelligence quotient (IQ) scores using the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence Revised (WPPSI-R) at four (Birch et al, 2007) and six (Willatts et al, 2013) years of age and one study the WPSSI, third edition (Colombo et al, 2013), also at six years of age. The study by Birch et al (2007) also included a group who consumed formula with added DHA alone.…”
Section: Fatty Acid Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent publications that assessed cognitive development between 18 months and 6 years of age showed benefits in children who received PUFA supplementation during infancy compared to those who did not. 35,36 Several publications recommend introducing ARA and DHA supplementation in pregnant women, nursing mothers, neonates, and infants. Pregnant women and nursing mothers should receive 200 mg/day of DHA.…”
Section: Polyunsaturated Fatty Acidsmentioning
confidence: 99%