2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2006.09.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term continuous cropping in the Pacific Northwest: Tillage and fertilizer effects on winter wheat, spring wheat, and spring barley production

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
1
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
26
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In a number of studies, it has been shown that in wheat, NT or reduced tillage can in some cases lead to an increase in grain yield in comparison to conventional agricultural systems [33][34][35][36]. In contrast, Machado et al [37] found that over six years, the yield of spring wheat was on average 21% lower in NT soils, thus indicating that the impact of NT on grain production largely depends on the environmental conditions and on the experimental set up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a number of studies, it has been shown that in wheat, NT or reduced tillage can in some cases lead to an increase in grain yield in comparison to conventional agricultural systems [33][34][35][36]. In contrast, Machado et al [37] found that over six years, the yield of spring wheat was on average 21% lower in NT soils, thus indicating that the impact of NT on grain production largely depends on the environmental conditions and on the experimental set up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the positive impacts of NT for environmental health through C sequestration, improving soil biological activity, soil structure, and soil water conservation were frequently reported (Hobbs et al, 2008;Six et al, 2002, FAO, 2011, Busari et al, 2015, the short-and long-term yield benefi ts from NT and CT have been mixed, that is, both, better yield from NT compared with CT (Endale et al, 2008;Toliver et al, 2012;Farooq et al, 2011) and better yield from CT compared with NT were reported (Davidson and Santelmann, 1973;Lund, 1993;MacHado et al, 2007). Perhaps that has contributed to slower adoption of NT technologies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Potter et al (1996) found that the difference between the yield of corn under NT and CT was not significant. He et al (2011) reported an increase in wheat and corn yield under NT as compared with CT in the North China Plain; whereas Machado et al (2007) found a decrease in wheat yield in the Pacific Northwest with NT compared to CT.…”
Section: Archives Of Agronomy and Soil Science 1071mentioning
confidence: 96%