2018
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2017.02.0104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long‐Term Tillage on Yield and Water Use of Grain Sorghum and Winter Wheat

Abstract: Core Ideas Average sorghum yield advantage was 120% for no tillage over conventional tillage and 55% for reduced tillage over conventional tillage.Average wheat yield advantage was 31% for no tillage over conventional tillage and 12% for reduced tillage over conventional tillage.Available soil water at planting in soil profile was less for conventional tillage than both no tillage and reduced tillage for both crops.There was a decline in wheat yield over time due to increased seasonal temperature. Tillage is a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
29
2
7

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(67 reference statements)
7
29
2
7
Order By: Relevance
“…This indicates explicitly that the conditions for wheat growth were less favorable in the CM than in the CR system. Similar observations were reported by Lund (1993), Debaeke et al (1996), Soane et al (2012), Ranjbar et al (2015), and by Schlegel et al (2018). Winter wheat grown in the CM system was also characterized by poorer grain quality, compared to the winter grains from the CR system, which was indicated by lower wet gluten content of the grain, lower grain volume weight and lesser grain uniformity, and by increased total ash content of the grain, compared to the CR system.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This indicates explicitly that the conditions for wheat growth were less favorable in the CM than in the CR system. Similar observations were reported by Lund (1993), Debaeke et al (1996), Soane et al (2012), Ranjbar et al (2015), and by Schlegel et al (2018). Winter wheat grown in the CM system was also characterized by poorer grain quality, compared to the winter grains from the CR system, which was indicated by lower wet gluten content of the grain, lower grain volume weight and lesser grain uniformity, and by increased total ash content of the grain, compared to the CR system.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The yield and quality of wheat grain are determined by coeffects of habitat, agrotechnical measures as well as plant species and cultivar (Rachon et al 2015;Schlegel et al 2018;Woźniak and Soroka 2018). Contemporary agricultural systems usually tend to minimize expenditures incurred on tillage and make use of specialist crop rotations including 2-3 plant species requiring the same or similar cultivation technology (Soane et al 2012;Roche et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Occasional tillage should not be confused with RT since reduced tillage often involves at least one tillage in a year or several tillage operations during the fallow phase. It was reported that there was a 16 and 41% yield advantage for wheat and grain sorghum in a NT system over a RT system in WSF rotation (Schlegel et al, 2018). Among the few available research reports on occasional tillage, indicators were (a) no negative effect on soil microbial biomass,…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other research (Schlegel et al, 2018), reduced tillage systems (with four tillage operations) produced lower yields than a complete no-tillage system in a WSF rotation. However, in this study, a single tillage operation in a 3-yr WSF rotation generally had little effect on wheat or grain sorghum yields from 2014-2018 at Garden City or Tribune, KS.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%