2016
DOI: 10.1007/s40003-016-0223-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term Conservation Tillage Effect on Soil Organic Carbon and Available Phosphorous Content in Vertisols of Central India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…() in Northern Great Plains in USA and Kushwa et al . () in vertisols of Central India. In fact, the non‐significant responses of SOC to NT under SB–0 N or SR–0 N were consistent with the results from many long‐term field trials (mostly <20 years) under continuous cereal crops in Australia (Carter & Mele, ; Fettell & Gill, ; Dalal & Chan, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…() in Northern Great Plains in USA and Kushwa et al . () in vertisols of Central India. In fact, the non‐significant responses of SOC to NT under SB–0 N or SR–0 N were consistent with the results from many long‐term field trials (mostly <20 years) under continuous cereal crops in Australia (Carter & Mele, ; Fettell & Gill, ; Dalal & Chan, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The information regarding the effect of CA on soil properties under the irrigated ecosystem in Indo-Gangetic Plains (IGPs) is plenty (Das et al 2014) but very scanty under rainfed regions. Although reports are available on most major nutrient status and SOC in CT soils (Srinivasarao et al 2014;Kushwa et al 2016), limited information is available on phosphorus and micro-nutrient status under the CA system in the rainfed Vertisols of Central India (Hati et al 2015;Kushwa et al 2016;Kushwah et al 2016). Therefore, this study hypothesized that the adoption of CA practices, even for the short term (< 5 years), could enhance the availability of macro-and micro-nutrients than CT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Furthermore, Liu (2019) showed that SS could reduce soil compaction and bulk density ( Zhang et al, 2017 ), and promote the transformation of straw, stubble, and roots into deep soils, thus increasing the carbon contents of deep soils. Kushwa et al (2016) found that CT often interferes with soil aggregates, leading to the exposure of the organic carbon protected by them, as well as the turnover of macro-aggregates, which leads to the decomposition of soil aggregates and AOC loss and limits crop yields. Compared with CT, the mean AOC content in the 0–40-cm soil layer increased by 5.4% and 9.1%, respectively, with NT and SS, but there was no significant difference between RT and CT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%