Abstract:Samples historically collected and analysed by the Continuous Plankton Recorder survey were used to examine long-term (1958 to 1994) patterns in the normal diel vertical migrat~on (NDVM) behaviour of 7 copepod taxa in the North Sea: Calanus finmarchicus C5-C6; Calanus spp. Cl-C4; Cenlropages typicus; Centropages hamatus; Temora longicornis; Acartia clausii and Para-Pseudocalanus (this last group included all Paracalanus and Pseudocalanus species). The ratio of night:day abundance near the surface was used as … Show more
“…Field data that are collected on relevant scales to permit analysis of habitat selection by marine zooplankton are scarce, especially from Subarctic and Arctic areas and even more so from advective and from oceanic areas (but see Hays et al 1996, Basedow et al 2008, Fossheim & Primicerio 2008. It is therefore no coincidence that most of our knowledge on habitat choice by zooplankton stems from limnetic areas and from modelling studies (Zaret & Suffern 1976, Neill 1990, Hugie & Dill 1994, Lampert et al 2003, Primicerio 2003.…”
Few studies have analysed the depth distribution of marine zooplankton at high-resolution, and knowledge obtained from theoretical modelling studies predominates over that from empirical field studies. We analysed depth selection by the marine copepod Calanus finmarchicus during spring and summer in neritic and oceanic Subarctic regions. Data on hydrography and zooplankton distribution in the upper 100 m were collected at high resolution by a towed instrument platform equipped with CTD, fluorometer and an optical plankton counter. Four extensive field data sets covering time windows from 3 to 11 d during the productive season were analysed using generalized additive mixed models. Our main findings were that: (1) mean depth of older development stages (CV and adults) of C. finmarchicus was best predicted by biotic factors (depth of the fluorescence maximum and population density), while abiotic factors (depth of the pycnocline) were of secondary importance, (2) depth selection was similar in neritic and oceanic areas, and (3) there was no evidence for synchronous diel vertical migration. Our results suggest that copepods dynamically and consistently select their habitat (depth) based on food conditions and predators in a densitydependent manner. We conclude that ecological interactions may drive habitat choice of planktonic organisms even in highly fluctuating oceanic environments.
“…Field data that are collected on relevant scales to permit analysis of habitat selection by marine zooplankton are scarce, especially from Subarctic and Arctic areas and even more so from advective and from oceanic areas (but see Hays et al 1996, Basedow et al 2008, Fossheim & Primicerio 2008. It is therefore no coincidence that most of our knowledge on habitat choice by zooplankton stems from limnetic areas and from modelling studies (Zaret & Suffern 1976, Neill 1990, Hugie & Dill 1994, Lampert et al 2003, Primicerio 2003.…”
Few studies have analysed the depth distribution of marine zooplankton at high-resolution, and knowledge obtained from theoretical modelling studies predominates over that from empirical field studies. We analysed depth selection by the marine copepod Calanus finmarchicus during spring and summer in neritic and oceanic Subarctic regions. Data on hydrography and zooplankton distribution in the upper 100 m were collected at high resolution by a towed instrument platform equipped with CTD, fluorometer and an optical plankton counter. Four extensive field data sets covering time windows from 3 to 11 d during the productive season were analysed using generalized additive mixed models. Our main findings were that: (1) mean depth of older development stages (CV and adults) of C. finmarchicus was best predicted by biotic factors (depth of the fluorescence maximum and population density), while abiotic factors (depth of the pycnocline) were of secondary importance, (2) depth selection was similar in neritic and oceanic areas, and (3) there was no evidence for synchronous diel vertical migration. Our results suggest that copepods dynamically and consistently select their habitat (depth) based on food conditions and predators in a densitydependent manner. We conclude that ecological interactions may drive habitat choice of planktonic organisms even in highly fluctuating oceanic environments.
“…While they did find such a correlation, their analysis has been challenged by Hirst & Batten (1998), primarily on 2 grounds: (1) Hays (1995) and Hays et al (1996) did not properly assess the dark period, mistakenly including some light periods as dark and vice-versa, due to seasonally changing day-lengths; (2) they used an index of diel migration, their 'DVMindeX1 (changed in the second paper to 'N/D,nde,'), which was sensitive to sample size. Hirst & Batten (1998) proposed their own, which they confusingly termed 'DVM' (the usual abbreviation for the phenomenon of diel vertical migration itself-] will refer to the index as 'HB'), designed to remedy the sample-size sensitivity in N/Dmde,, the Hays index.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…and Hays et al (1996) analyzed Continuous Plankton Recorder (CPR) records to determine if die1 vertical migrations (DVMs) of North Sea copepods had changed in response to changes in predator (chiefly herring) abundances between 1958 and 1996. While they did find such a correlation, their analysis has been challenged by Hirst & Batten (1998), primarily on 2 grounds: (1) Hays (1995) and Hays et al (1996) did not properly assess the dark period, mistakenly including some light periods as dark and vice-versa, due to seasonally changing day-lengths; (2) they used an index of diel migration, their 'DVMindeX1 (changed in the second paper to 'N/D,nde,'), which was sensitive to sample size.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the number of days covered by a sampling program is decreased, eventually there would be no way to identify the signals as true DVM. The depth sampled is usually about 6.5 m (Hays & Warner 1993), not really a 'surface' sample, and it is seldom clear whether the copepods were feeding at this depth, merely passing through, or engaging in 'reverse' DVMs from the surface layer (Roe 1974, Hays et al 1996. Even assuming that the copepods do spend the dark hours within the phytoplankton maximum, as the depth of this varies through the year, the perceived migration regime must vary with it.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As well as Temora longicornis and adult (C5-C6) Calanus finmarchicus (discussed above), Hays et al (1996) examined the CPR records of 5 copepod groupings: Calanus sp. Cl-C4, Cen tropages typicus, Cen tropages hamatus, Acartia clausii, and a combined category of Paracalanus sp.…”
Daily light–dark cycles drive the circadian rhythm of many ocean processes including photosynthesis, gene expression, and zooplankton diel vertical migration (DVM). In phosphate deplete surface ocean regions, microbes produce metalloenzymes, such as alkaline phosphatases (AP), to access dissolved organic phosphorus. Here, we provide novel evidence of diurnal variation in AP activity (APA) in the subtropical North Atlantic using two independent datasets, with APA being two‐ to three‐fold higher at night. We demonstrate that zooplankton are a source of AP and postulate that zooplankton DVM is a source of enhanced AP in the surface waters at night, with reduction or degradation of AP during the day. Our results challenge the current assumption that APA is linear over a 24‐h period. While future ocean scenarios predict intensification and expansion of oceanic phosphate limitation, our findings indicate a role for zooplankton in regenerating phosphate that is currently missing in conceptual and numerical models.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.