1991
DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.1991.tb03126.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LONG‐TERM CHANGES IN STREAMFLOW FOLLOWING LOGGING IN WESTERN OREGON AND ASSOCIATED FISHERIES IMPLICATIONS1

Abstract: The long-term effect of logging on low summer streamflow was investigated with a data set of 36 years. Hydrologic records were analyzed for the period 1953 and 1988 from Watershed (WS) 1 (clearcut logged and burned), WS 2 (unlogged control), and WS 3 (25 percent patch-cut logged and burned) in the H. J. Andrews Experimental Forest, western Cascade Range,Oregon. These records spanned 9-10 years before logging, and 21-25 years after logging and burning. Streamfiows in August were the lowest of any month, and wer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
84
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(15 reference statements)
4
84
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Some studies have demonstrated that forest loss can increase dry season runoff since the removal or death of forests can reduce evapotranspiration and canopy interception in disturbed sites and ultimately increase soil moisture and groundwater recharge [9]. Meanwhile, other studies have reported that fast vegetation regrowth and soil disturbances after forest harvesting may offset the water increment or even decrease dry season runoff [6,8,10]. Similarly, variable responses of dry season flow to afforestation or reforestation have also been found, which are mainly determined by the changes in soil properties caused by forest regrowth and forest practices [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies have demonstrated that forest loss can increase dry season runoff since the removal or death of forests can reduce evapotranspiration and canopy interception in disturbed sites and ultimately increase soil moisture and groundwater recharge [9]. Meanwhile, other studies have reported that fast vegetation regrowth and soil disturbances after forest harvesting may offset the water increment or even decrease dry season runoff [6,8,10]. Similarly, variable responses of dry season flow to afforestation or reforestation have also been found, which are mainly determined by the changes in soil properties caused by forest regrowth and forest practices [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies have attempted to quantify the potentially negative impacts of different forest practices on hydrology, water quality and aquatic habitat (e.g., Hicks et al, 1991;Macdonald et al, 2003) as well as the potential benefi ts in the form of increased water yield through forest management, particularly in relation to effects on snow accumulation and melt (e.g., Rich, 1972;Gottfried, 1991;Troendle et al, 2001). The prospect of widespread salvage harvesting in response to the current outbreak of mountain pine beetle in British Columbia has produced concern about the potential for negative hydrologic changes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the lack of buffer strips increased light in riparian zones, increasing growth at sites where plants may disproportionately affect summer flow by removing water directly from the hyporheic zone. Third, regrowth along the South Fork included many red alders (Alnus rubra), which tend to use more water than conifers (Hicks et al 1991). Fourth, a young, dense, rapidly growing age cohort may simply use more water than a mature stand (Moore et al 2004).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%