2010
DOI: 10.1681/asn.2009101043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-Term Cancer Risk of Immunosuppressive Regimens after Kidney Transplantation

Abstract: Cancer is a widely recognized complication of transplantation, and the effects of various immunosuppressive drugs on cancer risk remains controversial. This randomized trial allocated 489 recipients of first cadaveric renal transplants to one of three groups: Azathioprine and prednisolone, cyclosporine monotherapy, or cyclosporine monotherapy followed by a switch to azathioprine and prednisolone after 3 months. Here, we report cancer outcomes by non-skin cancer (including melanoma) and skin cancer (excluding m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
121
2
5

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 178 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(24 reference statements)
3
121
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Those recipients experiencing acute rejection are treated by pulses of increased immunosuppression, thus increasing their immunosuppressive burden overall. It is possible that small differences of effect do exist among drugs, but that these are outweighed by the far greater effects of other known risk factors for cancer, such as age, sex, history of smoking, underlying disease leading to transplantation, and history of prior cancers (Webster et al 2007;Gallagher et al 2010). Given the large effect of these known risk factors and the need to balance long-term cancer risk against recipient and graft survival, any small differences among drugs are likely to be clinically unimportant.…”
Section: The Role Of Components Of the Immunosuppressive Regimenmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Those recipients experiencing acute rejection are treated by pulses of increased immunosuppression, thus increasing their immunosuppressive burden overall. It is possible that small differences of effect do exist among drugs, but that these are outweighed by the far greater effects of other known risk factors for cancer, such as age, sex, history of smoking, underlying disease leading to transplantation, and history of prior cancers (Webster et al 2007;Gallagher et al 2010). Given the large effect of these known risk factors and the need to balance long-term cancer risk against recipient and graft survival, any small differences among drugs are likely to be clinically unimportant.…”
Section: The Role Of Components Of the Immunosuppressive Regimenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, differences among recipients taking cyclosporine versus those that are not has not resulted in differences in cancer in long-term trials (Gallagher et al 2010).…”
Section: The Role Of Components Of the Immunosuppressive Regimenmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Malignancy is a known complication among transplant recipients, and is likely to become even more common in these patients as donation criteria are extended to allow older donors, the age of patients on waiting list is increased, and transplant recipients live longer (Gallagher et al, 2010). However still there is a continuous struggle to keep the delicate balance between reducing the immunosuppression and maintaining the graft survival.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Odos karcinomos išsivystymui svarbus veiksnys yra ne tik bendras imunosupresinio gydymo intensyvumas [16,[35][36][37], bet ir skirtingos imunosupresinių vaistų savybės. Azatioprinas (antimetabolitas), veikdamas sinergistiškai su UV spinduliais, pasižymi mutageniniu poveikiu [38][39][40][41], kalcineurino inhibitoriai (pvz., ciklosporinas, takrolimuzas) skatina navikinių ląstelių invazyvumą ir angiogenezę [9,[42][43][44], be to, slopina DNR reparacijos mechanizmus [45].…”
unclassified