1999
DOI: 10.1056/nejm199911043411901
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-Term Benefit of Primary Angioplasty as Compared with Thrombolytic Therapy for Acute Myocardial Infarction

Abstract: During five years of follow-up, primary coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction was associated with lower rates of early and late death and nonfatal reinfarction, fewer hospital readmissions for ischemia or heart failure, and lower total medical charges than treatment with intravenous streptokinase.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
91
0
4

Year Published

2000
2000
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 569 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
91
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…With the Danish Multicenter Randomized Study on Fibrinolytic Therapy versus Acute Coronary Angioplasty in Acute Myocardial Infarction (DANAMI-2) trial [24] that ended in 2001 all STEMI patients were recommended to be treated with primary PCI if transportation time to an invasive center is less than two hours. Prior to this study PCI was known to reduce mortality in STEMI patients [25], but the transportation time to an invasive facility was considered a major limitation on the widespread use of PCI performed immediately after the STEMI. It is evident to see that the increase in the number of PCI performed on days 0-1 after MI (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the Danish Multicenter Randomized Study on Fibrinolytic Therapy versus Acute Coronary Angioplasty in Acute Myocardial Infarction (DANAMI-2) trial [24] that ended in 2001 all STEMI patients were recommended to be treated with primary PCI if transportation time to an invasive center is less than two hours. Prior to this study PCI was known to reduce mortality in STEMI patients [25], but the transportation time to an invasive facility was considered a major limitation on the widespread use of PCI performed immediately after the STEMI. It is evident to see that the increase in the number of PCI performed on days 0-1 after MI (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the current study the possibility of differentiated impact of treatment on prognosis has been eliminated because all patients underwent an early invasive treatment that has been proved to improve survival in patients with STEMI [18], NSTEMI [13, 14] and unstable angina [4]. Moreover, the recently reported reductions in the 6-month rates of new heart failure and mortality in patients with ACS may be attributed, at least in part, to the progressive increase in the use of primary PCI in these patients [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Primary PCI has in several studies been shown to be superior to fibrinolytic therapy with regard to recurrent ischemia, reinfarction and mortality [21, 22, 23], and in a recent study it was documented that primary PCI is superior to fibrinolysis also with regard to myocardial salvage and final infarct size [24]. Despite a primary PCI procedure, there are still patients, who have larger infarctions and severely impaired LV function, and in whom there is a higher risk of LV remodeling with LV dilation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%