2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.02.09.21251326
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lockdown and non-COVID-19 deaths: Cause-specific mortality during the first wave of the 2020 pandemic in Norway. A population-based register study

Abstract: Objective To explore the potential impact of the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic on all cause and cause-specific mortality in Norway. Design Population based register study. Setting The Norwegian cause of Death Registry and the National Population Register of Norway. Participants All recorded deaths in Norway during March to May from 2010 to 2020. Main outcome measures Rate (per 100 000) of all-cause mortality and causes of death in the EU Shortlist for Causes of Death March to May 2020. The rates were age-sta… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, at the time of our study, Norway had experienced no excess mortality and only a relatively moderate economic hardship owing to a set of well-funded governmental policies. 2 , 3 , 13 Second, our 2020 data collection took place approximately 8 to 10 months into the pandemic, during the peak of the second wave but after the school summer vacations and before the winter season. How the examined outcomes developed after the prolonged and more sustained pandemic exposure (ie, until spring 2021 or later) is not known from these relatively short-term data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…First, at the time of our study, Norway had experienced no excess mortality and only a relatively moderate economic hardship owing to a set of well-funded governmental policies. 2 , 3 , 13 Second, our 2020 data collection took place approximately 8 to 10 months into the pandemic, during the peak of the second wave but after the school summer vacations and before the winter season. How the examined outcomes developed after the prolonged and more sustained pandemic exposure (ie, until spring 2021 or later) is not known from these relatively short-term data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MyLife study aimed to recruit entire cohorts of 8th, 9th, and 10th grade students from 33 middle schools throughout Norway. All eligible students were invited to complete annual electronic surveys during class time while in middle school (ie, grades 8-10) and individually once in high school (ie, grades [11][12][13]. Baseline data collection took place during the 2017 fall semester.…”
Section: Study Design and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although overall mortality was not increased in Norway, in which the COVID-19-related mortality was low (only 216 COVID-19 deaths as of May 31, 2020; the time of reporting), the observed death rate from diabetes was 50% higher than predicted. 14 In the first pandemic wave in England, we showed that 30–35% of the excess mortality in those with diabetes was not associated with recording of COVID-19 on death certificates. 12 However, the access to testing outside hospital environments at that point was poor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…There were increased total deaths from diabetes in Australia as were observed in Italy, 7 and Norway during the first wave. 40 In the latter report, which focuses on the effects of lockdown (there were 216 COVID-19 deaths during the study period), the authors speculated that the observed 45% increase in diabetes deaths may have been due to some patients with diabetes inappropriately avoiding health care. This explanation that may also apply to the Australian findings, a hypothesis supported by data showing increases in diabetes deaths coincident with the two periods of stay-at-home orders (lockdowns) in the state of Victoria in 2020.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%