2003
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-45243-0_31
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Locally Optimized RANSAC

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
469
0
4

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 654 publications
(494 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
469
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In our simulation, the real error (6) is divided by a factor of 3 when considering datasets of n = 12 correspondences instead of n = 8. This behaviour was reported before in [3], where the normalized eight-point algorithm was compared to its variant for 7 correspondences, which takes as solution F = F 1 +αF 2 , for α such that det(F 1 + αF 2 ) = 0 [7].…”
Section: The Rank-two Constraintsupporting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our simulation, the real error (6) is divided by a factor of 3 when considering datasets of n = 12 correspondences instead of n = 8. This behaviour was reported before in [3], where the normalized eight-point algorithm was compared to its variant for 7 correspondences, which takes as solution F = F 1 +αF 2 , for α such that det(F 1 + αF 2 ) = 0 [7].…”
Section: The Rank-two Constraintsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…This is a requirement of the RANSAC [5] algorithm and variants. It can also be estimated using non-minimal but relatively small sets of data in the local random sampling method of Chum et al [3]. Finally, it is estimated using all the available inlier correspondences, yielding an initial solution for an overall error optimization, known as bundle adjustment [15]; even in this context, the size of the available dataset can be low due to typical problems in feature detection and matching.…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, we estimate the extrinsic pose (i.e., camera rotation and translation) with the P3P algorithm of Kneip et al (2011), yielding four estimates of the extrinsic pose. Poses that pass the T 1,1 test (Matas and Chum 2002) on a fourth sampled correspondence are improved further with a local optimization (Chum et al 2003), where we employ 10 inner RANSAC iterations on the inlier set. In each inner iteration, we sample 6 correspondences from the inlier set and use the non-minimal EPnP pose solver of Lepetit et al (2009) to calculate an improved extrinsic pose.…”
Section: Pose Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these strategies [2,3,4] aim to optimize the process of model verification, while others [5,6,7] seek to modify the sampling process in order to preferentially generate more useful hypotheses. While these efforts have shown considerable promise, none of them are directly applicable in situations where real-time performance is essential.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, we provide a comparative analysis of the important RANSAC algorithms that have been proposed over the past few years [2,3,4,5,7,8,11]. We classify the various approaches based on the aspect of RANSAC that they seek to optimize, and evaluate their performance on synthetic and real data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%