2001
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2400.2001.00258.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local owner‐based management of Finnish lake fisheries: social dimensions and power relations

Abstract: Traditionally most inland water bodies in Finland were privately owned as an extension of land ownership. Statutory ®shery associations are responsible for local decision-making on most lakes. Social dimensions have been tightly embedded in decision making by these associations. The local level of Finnish ®sheries management has been subjected to a fundamental shift from locally based subsistence ®shing and wide local participation in ®sheries associations to a wide range of non-local recreational demands and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests that development of fishing tourism could prove challenging if other landowners and local communities who are trying to develop longer, and better beats, want to rent their riverbank. These findings are supported by Salmi and Muje (2001), who found that small ownership units were a hindrance to voluntary cooperation in Finnish fishery associations. Olson (1965) termed this lack of collective action ‘the pervasiveness of latent groups’.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…This suggests that development of fishing tourism could prove challenging if other landowners and local communities who are trying to develop longer, and better beats, want to rent their riverbank. These findings are supported by Salmi and Muje (2001), who found that small ownership units were a hindrance to voluntary cooperation in Finnish fishery associations. Olson (1965) termed this lack of collective action ‘the pervasiveness of latent groups’.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…In some countries, institutions at the intermediate decision‐making level have been created, such as fisheries regions in Finland (Sipponen 1998, 1999; Salmi et al . 2000; Salmi and Muje 2001). Furthermore, at the lower level, there are sometimes voluntary codes or informal institutions (Ostrom et al .…”
Section: Evolution Of Inland Fisheries Management and Its Paradigms Imentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Private and public owners of water bodies such as state, province, federal states or industries, lease fishing rights to commercial or recreational fishermen, associations, cooperatives, clubs or organizations, which are often charged (sometimes by law) with the duty to manage fisheries resources and the ecosystems (e.g. Bninska 2000; Salmi and Muje 2001; Fig. 5).…”
Section: Evolution Of Inland Fisheries Management and Its Paradigms Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These associations, private water owners and commercial and recreational fishers’ associations are represented in the supervisory board of the next level of the management regime, the Fisheries Region. Fisheries Regions aim to promote planning and decision‐making in larger water areas than the fishery associations (Salmi & Muje 2001). Traditionally this governance has predominated in salmon fisheries near estuaries and in the river.…”
Section: Governance Of Salmon Fisheries In Finlandmentioning
confidence: 99%