2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.physleta.2019.126170
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local impact of Stone–Wales defect on a single layer GNRFET

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The transport behavior of this defect has interesting characteristics for a monolayer graphene FET. 27,35 However, there is no precise investigation for a SW defect located at different positions in BLGs. The role of the defect position is then examined for a BLGNRFET.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transport behavior of this defect has interesting characteristics for a monolayer graphene FET. 27,35 However, there is no precise investigation for a SW defect located at different positions in BLGs. The role of the defect position is then examined for a BLGNRFET.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Defects in graphene include intrinsic defects (Stone–Wales defects, single vacancy defects, multiple vacancy defects, line defects, and carbon adatoms) [ 80 ] and extrinsic defects (mainly oxygen‐containing functional groups on the surface of graphene). [ 81 ] Stone–Wales defects benefit from increasing the electronic conductivity of graphene when working as biosensors, [ 82 ] while extrinsic defects could work as sites for functionalization; [ 43 ] thus, defects are not undesirable in graphene for specific biomedical applications. STM, TEM, AFM, and Raman microscopy can be used to detect defects.…”
Section: Synthesis Of Graphene For Biomedical Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%