Abstract:• Este é um artigo publicado em acesso aberto e distribuído sob os termos da Licença de Atribuição Creative Commons, que permite uso irrestrito, distribuição e reprodução em qualquer meio, desde que o autor e a fonte originais sejam creditados.
“…Although this article does not include an analysis of state and domestic actors' agency in the international link of soy chains, some notions presented provide a good starting point for looking at that topic of the agrarian research agenda. For example, Do Vale (2018) stresses the existence of a transition global food regime that is displacing the neoliberal one with “a constellation” of less‐hierarchical actors (including China) who do not necessarily engage in zero‐sum relations. In parallel, Kappel (2010) considers that when dominant economies compete, the agency of nondominant national states may be enhanced through economic power or networking.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aims of the new coalition were to transform agriculture by switching production from tropical crops to food commodities aided by technological changes previously developed, and to turn Brazil into a key player in the global food circuit (Baumann & Mussi, 1999). The new coalition acted abroad in a concerted manner and took advantage of the opportunity offered by a global food regime in transition from a hierarchical regime (dominated by the United States and Europe) to another with a “constellation” of less‐hierarchical actors (MNCs, China) (Do Vale, 2018, pp. 8, 14).…”
Section: Case Studies On Argentina and Brazilmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8, 14). In the new regime, Brazilian and transnational actors can cooperate because there is no zero‐sum relationship (Do Vale, 2018, pp. 5–7).…”
Section: Case Studies On Argentina and Brazilmentioning
The literature on the transformation of Latin American agrarian productive and trade patterns (1990s to 2010s) tends to overemphasize traits of the agrarian extractivism concept, such as intensive mono‐production for exportation, sectoral disarticulation, concentration of benefits and power outside the producing nation, and degradation of environmental and labor conditions. At the same time, an analysis of the experiences of the Argentine and Brazilian soy chains shows that they include characteristics that the literature does not usually incorporate. After reviewing the literature and two case studies, we discuss the need to incorporate the agency of national state and nonstate actors into the analysis of agrarian extractivism. We argue that addressing this level and these actors' agency is necessary to understand the potential link between agrarian extractivism and economic development in Latin America. Empirical research relies on publications based on fieldwork and statistics. This article theorizes that agrarian systems are made up of chains whose links specialize in different distinct functions, and their actors' economic behavior is determined by their decision‐making (agency) capacity and rational choice. Power in chains is relational and mutates over time and according to changes in context, so this configuration opens the possibility of fostering economic development options through national actors and justifies their inclusion in the analysis of agrarian extractivism.
“…Although this article does not include an analysis of state and domestic actors' agency in the international link of soy chains, some notions presented provide a good starting point for looking at that topic of the agrarian research agenda. For example, Do Vale (2018) stresses the existence of a transition global food regime that is displacing the neoliberal one with “a constellation” of less‐hierarchical actors (including China) who do not necessarily engage in zero‐sum relations. In parallel, Kappel (2010) considers that when dominant economies compete, the agency of nondominant national states may be enhanced through economic power or networking.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aims of the new coalition were to transform agriculture by switching production from tropical crops to food commodities aided by technological changes previously developed, and to turn Brazil into a key player in the global food circuit (Baumann & Mussi, 1999). The new coalition acted abroad in a concerted manner and took advantage of the opportunity offered by a global food regime in transition from a hierarchical regime (dominated by the United States and Europe) to another with a “constellation” of less‐hierarchical actors (MNCs, China) (Do Vale, 2018, pp. 8, 14).…”
Section: Case Studies On Argentina and Brazilmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8, 14). In the new regime, Brazilian and transnational actors can cooperate because there is no zero‐sum relationship (Do Vale, 2018, pp. 5–7).…”
Section: Case Studies On Argentina and Brazilmentioning
The literature on the transformation of Latin American agrarian productive and trade patterns (1990s to 2010s) tends to overemphasize traits of the agrarian extractivism concept, such as intensive mono‐production for exportation, sectoral disarticulation, concentration of benefits and power outside the producing nation, and degradation of environmental and labor conditions. At the same time, an analysis of the experiences of the Argentine and Brazilian soy chains shows that they include characteristics that the literature does not usually incorporate. After reviewing the literature and two case studies, we discuss the need to incorporate the agency of national state and nonstate actors into the analysis of agrarian extractivism. We argue that addressing this level and these actors' agency is necessary to understand the potential link between agrarian extractivism and economic development in Latin America. Empirical research relies on publications based on fieldwork and statistics. This article theorizes that agrarian systems are made up of chains whose links specialize in different distinct functions, and their actors' economic behavior is determined by their decision‐making (agency) capacity and rational choice. Power in chains is relational and mutates over time and according to changes in context, so this configuration opens the possibility of fostering economic development options through national actors and justifies their inclusion in the analysis of agrarian extractivism.
“…The country is the world's third-largest agricultural exporter and the leader in the export of beef, chicken, sugar, corn, orange juice, and coffee. In terms of market share, Brazil has 18% of the international beef market and 32% of the poultry market (VALE, 2018). In 2011, taxes generated by the agriculture and livestock industries (20.68%) were greater than the average value of all the other economic sectors (13.59%), in addition to being the main driver of the influx of foreign currency to Brazil (MOREIRA et al, 2016).…”
Section: Sustainable Agribusiness: Technologically Advanced and Incre...mentioning
This article introduces the debate on low-carbon socio-technical transitions in Brazilian agribusiness, based on the premise that a growing portion of the industry adopts digital technologies in its business models, configuring a new productive paradigm: agriculture 4.0. We use the Sustainability Transitions theory to examine the relationship between agriculture 4.0 and climate change in Brazil, classifying Brazilian agribusiness into three subsectors: family farming, conservative agribusiness, and sustainable agribusiness. The article demonstrates technical, institutional, and political-economic challenges for each of these subsectors to support Brazil’s journey towards a low-carbon economy, observing that sustainable agribusiness has performed the best so far.
“…Sendo o terceiro maior exportador agrícola do mundo, o país é líder global em carne bovina, aves, soja, açúcar, milho, suco de laranja e café. Em market share, possui 18% do mercado internacional de carne bovina e 32% do de aves (VALE, 2018). Em 2011, os impostos gerados pelo setor agropecuário (20,68%) eram superiores à média dos demais setores econômicos (13,59%), além de ser o principal motor de entrada de moeda estrangeira no país (MOREIRA et al, 2016).…”
Section: Agronegócio Sustentável: Tecnologicamente Moderno E Crescent...unclassified
Resumo Este artigo introduz o debate sobre transições sociotécnicas de baixo-carbono no agronegócio brasileiro, partindo da premissa de que parcela crescente do setor adota tecnologias digitais em seus modelos de negócios, configurando um novo paradigma produtivo, a agricultura 4.0. Utilizamos a teoria de Transições para a Sustentabilidade para examinar a relação entre agricultura 4.0 e mudanças climáticas no Brasil. Para tanto, classificamos o agronegócio em três subsetores: agricultura familiar, agronegócio conservador, e agronegócio sustentável. O artigo demonstra desafios de ordem técnica, institucional e político-econômica para cada um desses subsetores avançar em direção a uma economia de baixo carbono, sendo o agronegócio sustentável o que tem tido melhor desempenho até o momento.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.