2004
DOI: 10.1108/meq.2004.15.3.336.2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local Forest Management – The Impacts of Devolution Policies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
21
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Efforts to increase forest cover and stand volume were reinitiated in 1978, but the “third great cutting” in the early 1980s, which has been blamed on excessive harvest by timber farms and insecure forest tenure rights among villagers (Edmunds and Wollenburg, 2003; Hyde et al, 2003), set back efforts to increase the forestry inventory. Planting of shelterbelts, engineered forests, and economic forests did not contribute large gains in coverage and volume until the early 1990s.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Efforts to increase forest cover and stand volume were reinitiated in 1978, but the “third great cutting” in the early 1980s, which has been blamed on excessive harvest by timber farms and insecure forest tenure rights among villagers (Edmunds and Wollenburg, 2003; Hyde et al, 2003), set back efforts to increase the forestry inventory. Planting of shelterbelts, engineered forests, and economic forests did not contribute large gains in coverage and volume until the early 1990s.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, forest claims may assert different dimensions of justice , which can be broadly distinguished as redistribution, representation, and recognition (Schlosberg 2004 ; Walker 2011 ), and some dimensions of justice may be more valued than others in given socio-political contexts or by certain actors. Different dimensions of justice may explain why villagers may resist co-management initiatives, even where those deliver tangible benefits: aspects of participation and recognition may be more important to them than redistributive actions (Edmunds and Wollenberg 2003 ). Similarly, the Indian government’s redistribution of individual tenure rights to tribal households encounters opposition because it does not meet their demands for recognition of traditional kinship relations and connectedness to ancestral land (Bose 2013 ).…”
Section: Conflict Over Forest and Politics Of Justicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no definition of forest, nature, destruction, and conservation, without any construction made by humans. In other words, there is no nature without human construction (Sarin et al, 2003;Edmunds and Wollenberg 2003;Dove et al, 2011). This perspective tends to be radical because it ignores the fact that nature, or forests, also have structures beyond human control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%