2011 Eighth International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery (FSKD) 2011
DOI: 10.1109/fskd.2011.6020071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Load balancing in MapReduce environments for data intensive applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Four load balancing algorithms are tested in terms of comparison including default FIFO, fixed window load balancing, computing ratio , and the proposed dynamic load balancing algorithm with dynamic window size. The algorithm of the MapReduce job is MR‐LSI .…”
Section: Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four load balancing algorithms are tested in terms of comparison including default FIFO, fixed window load balancing, computing ratio , and the proposed dynamic load balancing algorithm with dynamic window size. The algorithm of the MapReduce job is MR‐LSI .…”
Section: Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MapReduce has been taken up by the community in dealing with data‐intensive applications . However, MapReduce only offers simple job‐scheduling schemes which may deteriorate the performance significantly in heterogeneous computing environments . Fan et al .…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MapReduce has been taken up by the community in dealing with data-intensive applications [23][24][25]. However, MapReduce only offers simple job-scheduling schemes which may deteriorate the performance significantly in heterogeneous computing environments [24,[26][27][28]. Fan et al [29] proposed a reducer-phase-based load-balancing algorithm; however, mappers are highly time-consuming as computational tasks are usually executed by mappers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After getting the support of each item, we construct distributed FPtree to mine frequent itemsets. Inappropriate task allocation in a distributed environment will reduce the utilization of resources, seriously affect the efficiency of program execution [10] [11]. If the task is assigned unreasonably, it will cause the following: the execution time of the computer A is T, in a wait state because the task is finished; the execution time of the computer B is 10T.…”
Section: • Weighing the Allocation Of Tasksmentioning
confidence: 99%