2016
DOI: 10.1002/cpe.3763
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A sliding window‐based dynamic load balancing for heterogeneous Hadoop clusters

Abstract: Summary At present MapReduce computing model‐based Hadoop framework has gradually become the most famous distributed computing framework because of its remarkable features such as scalability, fault tolerance, data security, and powerful IO ability. However, Hadoop framework only supports limited load balancing policies, which may result in performance deterioration in heterogeneous clusters. Additionally Hadoop does not have advanced dynamic load balancing mechanism in enabling its optimal performance in dyna… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(35 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The aforementioned researches indicate that the parallelized BPNN benefits from the advantages of the Hadoop framework. However, several researches pointed out that the load imbalance issue of the distributed training significantly impacts the data processing efficiency in a heterogeneous Hadoop cluster [17], [19], [29]. Although Hadoop has a number of default schedulers such as FIFO, fair scheduler, and capacity scheduler, these universal schedulers cannot adapt to various kinds of Hadoop jobs [14]- [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The aforementioned researches indicate that the parallelized BPNN benefits from the advantages of the Hadoop framework. However, several researches pointed out that the load imbalance issue of the distributed training significantly impacts the data processing efficiency in a heterogeneous Hadoop cluster [17], [19], [29]. Although Hadoop has a number of default schedulers such as FIFO, fair scheduler, and capacity scheduler, these universal schedulers cannot adapt to various kinds of Hadoop jobs [14]- [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although Hadoop has a number of default schedulers such as FIFO, fair scheduler, and capacity scheduler, these universal schedulers cannot adapt to various kinds of Hadoop jobs [14]- [16]. Additionally scheduler designed for a specific type of Hadoop job [14]- [16] may not serve the other types of the jobs well [17]. Research [17] also presented a load balancing algorithm which can serve multiple types of Hadoop jobs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Duan [1] used the CPU utilization rate, disk utilization ratio, page error number, request number, request response time and other relevant indicators to calculate the real-time load of the server. Gang [2] proposed a method to classify the user requested services to allocate the system resources, so as to achieve dynamic load balancing. Shailesh [3] used a fuzzy dynamic load balancing algorithm to achieve load balancing through task scheduling.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is important that special attention should be given to restructure the system behaviors in accordance with the changes in user behaviors by balancing the system load. Existing system load balancing methods [1][2][3] are mainly based on resource allocation and task scheduling strategies, but not consider when and how to dynamically reconstruct the system behaviors for the real-time load equilibrium.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Hadoop does not have a sophisticated scheme in job scheduling. For this purpose, Liu et al present a dynamic load balancing algorithm on the basis of sliding windows with an aim to target at heterogeneous Hadoop cluster systems. Hadoop has over 190 parameters for user to configure.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%