Livelihoods or ecopreneurship? Agro‐economic experiments in Hambantota, Sri Lanka

Abstract

PurposeIn the context of contemporary debates on ecopreneurship and sustainable livelihoods, this article seeks to compare two programmes to promote a certain type of agro‐economic practice among rural farmers. By following the successes and failures of these programmes, the text interrogates how such initiatives are evaluated by the surrounding community of aid agencies and governmental bodies.Design/methodology/approachDeploying the theoretical notion of “performativity”, as used within economic anthropology, the article posits that the above‐mentioned programmes can be construed as economic experiments. More specifically, the text compares two concurrent initiatives: One ecopreneurial experiment instigated by a social entrepreneur, and one livelihoods‐focussed experiment instigated by an aid agency. The case study is based upon material from a three‐year ethnography of entrepreneurship‐promoting programmes in Hambantota, Sri Lanka.FindingsWhile the ecopreneurial venture fails, the livelihoods‐based initiative proves successful in demonstrating its economic validity. The case study indicates that, in the context of modes of evaluation focusing on day‐to‐day incomes of farmers, it may be difficult for ecopreneurs to make room for ecological experimentation.Originality/valueHaving identified this “ecopreneur's dilemma”, the article prompts scholars and policy‐makers to investigate it further, and potentially re‐examine how the livelihoods agenda is implemented in practice.

Hybrid organisations contributing to wellbeing in Small Pacific Island Countries

“…In some situations, a project may subsequently develop into an informal network to expand the scope of the project. Ecopreneurship has focusing on a similar innovation and change intention to social entrepreneurship, but rather than focusing on social causes such as entrenched poverty, ecopreneurship aims to address environmental issues (Palmås and Lindberg, 2013;Pastakia, 1998). The innovation intention of ecopreneurship and social entrepreneurship distinguishes these concepts from community or social enterprises that aim to provide ongoing support services rather than organise change.…”

Identifying Business Ethics Manifestation in Ecopreneurship Implementation: Study from Fish 'n Blues Enterprise in Indonesian Fishery Industry

“…factor that tempted other parties to actively go-green and on the other side to the "push" factors of government regulation and local stakeholder or community [25].…”

“Rapid” but not “raid”

“…Holliday (1995) as cited in Mouly and Sankaran (2006) highlights that in small and medium business, the reason for not having a number of ethnographic studies may be because there was not enough time for another person to hang around and ask questions as entrepreneurs engage in a number of activities. The available ethnographic research in entrepreneurship includes but is not limited to Dana and Remes (2005), Lalonde (2013), O’Neill (1997), Palmås and Lindberg (2013) and Reichman (2013). These studies note the wider context and culture along with the main research issue.…”