1996
DOI: 10.1127/archiv-hydrobiol/138/1996/199
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Litter decomposition in a mountain cave water

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Litter input is particularly important in systems where autochthonous production is low, thus litter decomposition may be a useful measure of bioassessment in several of those freshwater habitats. To date, most work on litter decomposition has been done in streams, but water tanks in bromeliads (Benavides-Gordillo et al, 2019;Migliorini et al, 2018), caves (Galas et al, 1996;Silva et al, 2013), marshes (Flury & Gessner, 2011), small reservoirs (Colas et al, 2016), and shallow lakes (Alp et al, 2016;Carvalho et al, 2015;Pope et al, 1999) have also been tested for the effects of distinct biotic and abiotic stressors on litter decomposition. For example, Frainer et al (2014) compared decomposition rates between pools and riffles within streams, and found large differences in decomposition rates between the two habitats, which were explained by differences in the benthic invertebrate community composition and phenology (see Sect.…”
Section: Habitat: From Lotic To Lentic Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Litter input is particularly important in systems where autochthonous production is low, thus litter decomposition may be a useful measure of bioassessment in several of those freshwater habitats. To date, most work on litter decomposition has been done in streams, but water tanks in bromeliads (Benavides-Gordillo et al, 2019;Migliorini et al, 2018), caves (Galas et al, 1996;Silva et al, 2013), marshes (Flury & Gessner, 2011), small reservoirs (Colas et al, 2016), and shallow lakes (Alp et al, 2016;Carvalho et al, 2015;Pope et al, 1999) have also been tested for the effects of distinct biotic and abiotic stressors on litter decomposition. For example, Frainer et al (2014) compared decomposition rates between pools and riffles within streams, and found large differences in decomposition rates between the two habitats, which were explained by differences in the benthic invertebrate community composition and phenology (see Sect.…”
Section: Habitat: From Lotic To Lentic Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%