2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00027-021-00815-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The structure and functionality of communities and food webs in streams along the epigean–hypogean continuum: unifying ecological stoichiometry and metabolic theory of ecology

Abstract: Subterranean streams represent unique heterotrophic ecosystems, usually supported by organic matter imported from the surface. Traditionally, the biological communities from subterranean streams were characterised as simple associations, with low diversity and species abundance, comprising mostly aquatic invertebrates connected by few trophic links compared with those of the surface. However, these features have not yet been described in the wider context of fluxes of energy and nutrients through food webs alo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 136 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The current applications of ecological stoichiometry are mainly focused on environmental assessment (Nie et al, 2012;Wang et al, 2022), forest succession and recession (Wardle et al, 2004;Liu et al, 2022), consumer-driven nutrient cycles (Elser and Urabe, 1999), population dynamics (Andersen et al, 2004), nutrient dynamics (Sterner and Hessen, 1994;Czamanski et al, 2011), nutrient supply and demand balance (Schade et al, 2005), nutrient limitation and carbon cycling (Nessel et al, 2021;Fernández-Martínez, 2022;Filipiak and Filipiak, 2022), food webs (Glibert et al, 2011;Pacioglu et al, 2021), biogeochemical niches (González et al, 2017;Peñuelas et al, 2019;Sardans et al, 2021), biological invasions (González et al, 2010), and biological evolution (Sardans et al, 2012;Jeyasingh et al, 2014). Ecological stoichiometry theory has become an effective tool and provided new ideas for studying consumer stoichiometry, nutrient cycles, and biogeochemical cycles.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current applications of ecological stoichiometry are mainly focused on environmental assessment (Nie et al, 2012;Wang et al, 2022), forest succession and recession (Wardle et al, 2004;Liu et al, 2022), consumer-driven nutrient cycles (Elser and Urabe, 1999), population dynamics (Andersen et al, 2004), nutrient dynamics (Sterner and Hessen, 1994;Czamanski et al, 2011), nutrient supply and demand balance (Schade et al, 2005), nutrient limitation and carbon cycling (Nessel et al, 2021;Fernández-Martínez, 2022;Filipiak and Filipiak, 2022), food webs (Glibert et al, 2011;Pacioglu et al, 2021), biogeochemical niches (González et al, 2017;Peñuelas et al, 2019;Sardans et al, 2021), biological invasions (González et al, 2010), and biological evolution (Sardans et al, 2012;Jeyasingh et al, 2014). Ecological stoichiometry theory has become an effective tool and provided new ideas for studying consumer stoichiometry, nutrient cycles, and biogeochemical cycles.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%