Citation: Strimbu, B. M., A. Amarioarei, and M. Paun. 2017. A parsimonious approach for modeling uncertainty within complex nonlinear relationships. Ecosphere 8(9):e01945. 10. 1002/ecs2.1945 Abstract. Advancements in information technology led environmental scientists to the illusion that efforts should be mainly focused on developing models that reduce uncertainty rather than on models adjusted to the existing uncertainty. As a result, environmental relationships are represented by non-parsimonious and suboptimal models, which in many instances could be even wrong. The objective of this research was to provide scientists focused on modeling ecosystem processes with a procedure that supplies parsimonious correct results. The procedure transforms the response variable to achieve a linear model and the normality of the residuals. After the parameters of the transformed model are estimated, the bias induced by back-transforming is corrected. We have computed the bias corrections for 11 of the most popular functions from the power, trigonometric, and hyperbolic families by considering the truncated normal distribution, when necessary. Using generated data, we have shown that the proposed procedure supplies unbiased results. We have identified a sample size artifact of data generation such that when the variance increases the truncation of distribution starts altering the corrections of predicted values, sometimes by more than 50% from the actual values. Our results indicate that uncertainty, measured by variance, impacts the analysis in a non-intuitive way when the defining domain of the response variable is restricted. The subtle way of influencing the development of complex nonlinear models by uncertainty advocates the usage of parsimonious linear models, which are less sensitive to the method of processing data. Finally, ecosystem processes should be modeled with strategies that consider not only processes and computation aspects, but also uncertainty, in particularly reducing variance to levels with no significant impact on the results.
The parameters of nonlinear forest models are commonly estimated with heuristic techniques, which can supply erroneous values. The use of heuristic algorithms is partially rooted in the avoidance of transformation of the dependent variable, which introduces bias when back-transformed to original units. Efforts were placed in computing the unbiased estimates for some of the power, trigonometric, and hyperbolic functions since only few transformations of the predicted variable have the corrections for bias estimated. The approach that supplies unbiased results when the dependent variable is transformed without heuristic algorithms, but based on a Taylor series expansion requires implementation details. Therefore, the objective of our study is to investigate the efficient expansion of the Taylor series that should be included in applications, such that numerical bias is not present. We found that five functions require more than five terms, whereas the arcsine, arccosine, and arctangent did not. Furthermore, the Taylor series expansion depends on the variance. We illustrated the results on two forest modeling problems, one at the stand level, namely site productivity, and one at individual tree level, namely taper. The models that are presented in the paper are unbiased, more parsimonious, and they have a RMSE comparable with existing less parsimonious models.
We consider the two-dimensional discrete scan statistic generated by a block-factor type model obtained from i.i.d. sequence. We present an approximation for the distribution of the scan statistics and the corresponding error bounds. A simulation study illustrates our methodology.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.