2015
DOI: 10.4000/interfaces.245
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Literature in the expanded field: intermediality at the crossroads of literary theory and comparative literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
1
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…On the flipside, with his design Blake also contributed to the development of the field of comparative arts and intermediality. As Erika Fischer‐Lichte (2016, p. 6) asserts, “‘intermediality’ addresses combinations and processes of exchange between different media.” That is very relevant especially if we are aware that comparative literature is, as of now, no longer concerned only with texts, but also with nonverbal media, other art and non‐art forms, becoming “a mode of reading beyond literature” (Baetens & Martinez, 2015, p. 290). That greatly emphasises the role of the design due to the fact that the strands in comparative arts and intermediality are promoting to a greater extent literature and film, music, dance, painting, sculpture or literature and other non‐art forms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the flipside, with his design Blake also contributed to the development of the field of comparative arts and intermediality. As Erika Fischer‐Lichte (2016, p. 6) asserts, “‘intermediality’ addresses combinations and processes of exchange between different media.” That is very relevant especially if we are aware that comparative literature is, as of now, no longer concerned only with texts, but also with nonverbal media, other art and non‐art forms, becoming “a mode of reading beyond literature” (Baetens & Martinez, 2015, p. 290). That greatly emphasises the role of the design due to the fact that the strands in comparative arts and intermediality are promoting to a greater extent literature and film, music, dance, painting, sculpture or literature and other non‐art forms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kajian intermedialitas (Wolf, 2011, p. 2) dilandasi atas kenyataan bahwa media mempengaruhi bagaimana sebuah isi karya dapat dibayangkan untuk diciptakan, bagaimana bakal disajikan, dan bagaimana penikmat karya mempunyai pengalaman yang berbeda. Istilah intermedialitas ini menjadi payung bagi beberapa istilah di dalam kajian karya yang terkait dengan penggunaan, perluasan, dan adaptasi atau penyajian ulang melalui bermacam media seperti multimodalitas, transmedialitas, dan remediasi (Baetens & Sánchez-Mesa, 2015;Blanariu, 2015;Rajewsky, 2005).…”
Section: Wilayah Baru Dalam Sastra Bandinganunclassified
“…Sementara itu, dunia digital telah mempengaruhi dan merombak batas-batas tradisional yang berkenaan dengan sastra, kepengarangan, konstruk baru akan identitas dan budaya, media dan pengalaman baru di dalam mengekspresikan dan meresepsi karya sastra dan produk budaya lainnya (Romero López, 2009;Ty, 2018). Era digital menghadirkan perspektif kosmopolitanisme dan ruang interaksi sosial yang berbeda dibandingkan dengan sebelumnya yang mempengaruhi ruang lingkup sastra bandingan (Boruszko, 2013), budaya transmedia, dan redefinisi lintas budaya dalam era konvergensi budaya di lingkungan digital (Baetens & Sánchez-Mesa, 2015). Dalam keadaan inilah kemudian kajian intermedialitas menjadi ranah baru yang ramai dikaji di dalam sastra bandingan.…”
Section: Penutupunclassified
“…Sur les différences entre « intermédialité » et « transmédialité », voir Jan Baetens et Domingo Sánchez-Mesa Martínez (2015) : http://journals.openedition.org/interfaces/245 (consulté le 11 juillet 2022). Selon les auteurs, cette opposition repose sur des modes théoriques différents pour décrire le transfert entre les médiums traditionnels de masse et les cultures numériques interactives.…”
unclassified